PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVV vs. GSIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVV vs. GSIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with IVV having a 8.96% return and GSIE slightly lower at 8.75%. Over the past 10 years, IVV has outperformed GSIE with an annualized return of 14.93%, while GSIE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.39% annualized return.


IVV

1D
0.10%
1M
0.80%
6M
7.81%
YTD
8.96%
1Y
17.37%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
14.93%
ALL TIME*
8.41%

GSIE

1D
0.46%
1M
1.03%
6M
5.39%
YTD
8.75%
1Y
17.13%
3Y*
15.96%
5Y*
8.63%
10Y*
9.39%
ALL TIME*
8.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$16.98M$19.56M$19.60M
$3.37B$4.55B$5.92B

IVV vs. GSIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
8.96%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
8.75%32.53%5.23%16.99%-15.86%13.27%7.45%22.83%-13.40%26.22%

Correlation

The correlation between IVV and GSIE is 0.76, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2015

0.78

The correlation between IVV and GSIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVV vs. GSIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVV
GSIE

Technology

38.4%
10.6%

Financial Services

12.0%
27.3%

Communication Services

9.8%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
8.6%

Healthcare

8.9%
9.6%

Industrials

8.0%
18.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
7.5%

Energy

3.3%
4.2%

Utilities

2.2%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
5.4%

Technology

IVV
38.4%
GSIE
10.6%

Financial Services

IVV
12.0%
GSIE
27.3%

Communication Services

IVV
9.8%
GSIE
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IVV
9.2%
GSIE
8.6%

Healthcare

IVV
8.9%
GSIE
9.6%

Industrials

IVV
8.0%
GSIE
18.6%

Consumer Defensive

IVV
4.5%
GSIE
7.5%

Energy

IVV
3.3%
GSIE
4.2%

Utilities

IVV
2.2%
GSIE
3.3%

Real Estate

IVV
1.9%
GSIE
1.2%

Basic Materials

IVV
1.7%
GSIE
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVV vs. GSIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GSIE
GSIE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GSIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSIE Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
GSIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSIE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVV vs. GSIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVVGSIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.58

+0.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.66

5.99

+2.67

IVV vs. GSIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVV Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the GSIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVV and GSIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVV vs. GSIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVV drawdown since its inception was -55.25%, which is greater than GSIE's maximum drawdown of -34.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVV and GSIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVVGSIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.25%

-34.63%

-20.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-10.76%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-13.07%

-5.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.53%

-29.97%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

-34.63%

+0.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-1.06%

-1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.73%

-5.99%

-4.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

2.84%

-0.78%

Volatility

IVV vs. GSIE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) and Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF (GSIE) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVVGSIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

3.56%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

12.39%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.69%

14.49%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.98%

16.08%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.05%

16.49%

+1.56%

IVV vs. GSIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVV has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GSIE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVV vs. GSIE - Dividend Comparison

IVV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than GSIE's 2.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GSIE
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity ETF
2.56%2.65%3.11%2.87%3.01%2.40%1.60%2.80%2.68%2.31%2.15%0.13%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.10%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVV and GSIE have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GSIE has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to IVV (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVV dropped -55.25% vs GSIE's -34.63%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 14.93% vs 9.39% for GSIE. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 3.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 14.93% return vs 9.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GSIE.

GSIE has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.10% for IVV.

IVV is categorized as S&P 500, while GSIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IVV tracks S&P 500 Index, while GSIE tracks Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta International Equity Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for IVV and 0.25% for GSIE.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.41 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVV and GSIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer