IVRS vs. PSI
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and PSI (Invesco Semiconductors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while PSI is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 7.73%/yr vs 44.83%/yr for PSI. Their 0.65 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for PSI.
Performance
IVRS vs. PSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than PSI's 76.39% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 1Y
- -11.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
PSI
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- -11.98%
- 6M
- 45.93%
- YTD
- 76.39%
- 1Y
- 136.90%
- 3Y*
- 44.83%
- 5Y*
- 26.49%
- 10Y*
- 30.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.57%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $45.64K | $34.99K | $21.63K | |
| $73.94M | $63.66M | $74.26M |
IVRS vs. PSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -7.07% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 76.39% | 36.32% | 17.17% | 21.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and PSI is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.65 |
The correlation between IVRS and PSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVRS vs. PSI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
PSI
Communication Services
-
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
IVRS
PSI
-
Technology
IVRS
PSI
Financial Services
IVRS
PSI
-
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
PSI
-
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
PSI
-
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
PSI
-
Energy
IVRS
-
PSI
-
Healthcare
IVRS
-
PSI
-
Industrials
IVRS
-
PSI
Real Estate
IVRS
-
PSI
-
Utilities
IVRS
-
PSI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. PSI — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
PSI
IVRS vs. PSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRS | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.39 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 3.85 | -4.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 17.24 | -17.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. PSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum PSI drawdown of -62.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and PSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -62.96% | +31.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -35.74% | +4.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -41.07% | +9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.06% | -25.95% | +5.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -15.92% | +9.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.79% | 7.97% | +8.82% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. PSI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) is 7.97%, while Invesco Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a volatility of 22.74%. This indicates that IVRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | PSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 22.74% | -14.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.96% | 43.67% | -23.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 50.08% | -26.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 40.62% | -19.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 36.57% | -15.69% |
IVRS vs. PSI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than PSI's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. PSI - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than PSI's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.62% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF | 0.03% | 0.10% | 0.15% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and PSI have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSI has higher volatility (22.74%) compared to IVRS (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs PSI's -62.96%.
On 3-year performance, PSI leads with 44.83% vs 7.73% for IVRS. On fees, IVRS is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 7.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PSI has performed better with a 44.83% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVRS is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PSI.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.62%, compared with 0.03% for PSI.
IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while PSI is Semiconductors. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while PSI tracks Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.56% for PSI.
PSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and PSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer