PSI vs. SMH
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH).
PSI and SMH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSI is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Dynamic Semiconductors Intellidex Index. It was launched on Jun 23, 2005. SMH is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2011. Both PSI and SMH are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PSI or SMH.
Performance
PSI vs. SMH - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSI achieves a 9.15% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 37.22% return. Over the past 10 years, PSI has underperformed SMH with an annualized return of 21.93%, while SMH has yielded a comparatively higher 28.12% annualized return.
PSI
9.15%
-5.33%
-8.19%
23.46%
21.55%
21.93%
SMH
37.22%
-2.98%
4.21%
49.18%
32.05%
28.12%
Key characteristics
PSI | SMH | |
---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio | 0.67 | 1.44 |
Sortino Ratio | 1.09 | 1.95 |
Omega Ratio | 1.14 | 1.26 |
Calmar Ratio | 0.90 | 2.00 |
Martin Ratio | 2.30 | 5.45 |
Ulcer Index | 10.33% | 9.13% |
Daily Std Dev | 35.56% | 34.45% |
Max Drawdown | -62.96% | -95.73% |
Current Drawdown | -19.08% | -14.69% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSI vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSI has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.
Correlation
The correlation between PSI and SMH is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PSI vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF (PSI) and VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PSI vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison
PSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than SMH's 0.43% yield.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF | 0.20% | 0.40% | 0.61% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.52% | 0.83% | 0.21% | 0.68% | 0.16% | 1.77% | 0.57% |
VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF | 0.43% | 0.60% | 2.37% | 1.02% | 1.38% | 6.00% | 3.75% | 2.85% | 1.61% | 4.28% | 2.31% | 3.11% |
Drawdowns
PSI vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSI drawdown since its inception was -62.96%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -95.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSI and SMH. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PSI vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF (PSI) has a higher volatility of 9.56% compared to VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at 8.20%. This indicates that PSI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.