PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVRS vs. NXTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVRS vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than NXTG's 54.54% return.


IVRS

1D
-2.21%
1M
1.13%
YTD
-5.51%
6M
-8.57%
1Y
-1.11%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
10Y*

NXTG

1D
-0.82%
1M
22.84%
YTD
54.54%
6M
55.39%
1Y
82.82%
3Y*
35.56%
5Y*
19.17%
10Y*
17.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRS vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
-5.51%12.75%7.40%28.15%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
54.54%28.46%12.85%16.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and NXTG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2023

0.75

The correlation between IVRS and NXTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVRS vs. NXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVRS
NXTG

Technology

38.4%
66.1%

Communication Services

37.3%
21.7%

Financial Services

19.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
0.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

4.3%

Real Estate

-

7.5%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

IVRS
38.4%
NXTG
66.1%

Communication Services

IVRS
37.3%
NXTG
21.7%

Financial Services

IVRS
19.7%
NXTG

-

Consumer Cyclical

IVRS
4.6%
NXTG
0.4%

Basic Materials

IVRS

-

NXTG

-

Consumer Defensive

IVRS

-

NXTG

-

Energy

IVRS

-

NXTG

-

Healthcare

IVRS

-

NXTG

-

Industrials

IVRS

-

NXTG
4.3%

Real Estate

IVRS

-

NXTG
7.5%

Utilities

IVRS

-

NXTG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVRS vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRS
IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

NXTG
NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRS vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVRSNXTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.77

-0.76

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

8.10

-8.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

31.73

-31.81

IVRS vs. NXTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is lower than the NXTG Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRS and NXTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVRSNXTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

4.52

-4.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.69

-0.08

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum NXTG drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and NXTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVRSNXTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.43%

-33.61%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.43%

-10.28%

-21.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.43%

-17.75%

-13.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.72%

-0.82%

-17.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-7.87%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.55%

2.62%

+11.93%

Volatility

IVRS vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) is 5.53%, while First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that IVRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVRSNXTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

8.27%

-2.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.59%

15.26%

+3.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.85%

18.44%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

17.93%

+2.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

18.88%

+1.61%

IVRS vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVRS vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than NXTG's 1.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
8.34%7.88%6.65%0.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
1.11%1.56%1.51%2.15%2.04%1.97%1.04%0.77%1.27%1.65%1.23%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVRS and NXTG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTG has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to IVRS (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs NXTG's -33.61%.

On 3-year performance, NXTG leads with 35.56% vs 9.46% for IVRS. On fees, IVRS is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NXTG has performed better with a 35.56% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVRS is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.

IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 1.11% for NXTG.

IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.70% for NXTG.

NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVRS and NXTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer