IVRS vs. NXTG
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and NXTG (First Trust IndXX NextG ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IVRS tracks the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net while NXTG tracks the Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 9.46%/yr vs 35.56%/yr for NXTG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NXTG.
Performance
IVRS vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly lower than NXTG's 54.54% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- -5.51%
- 6M
- -8.57%
- 1Y
- -1.11%
- 3Y*
- 9.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTG
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- 22.84%
- YTD
- 54.54%
- 6M
- 55.39%
- 1Y
- 82.82%
- 3Y*
- 35.56%
- 5Y*
- 19.17%
- 10Y*
- 17.94%
IVRS vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -5.51% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 54.54% | 28.46% | 12.85% | 16.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and NXTG is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2023 | 0.75 |
The correlation between IVRS and NXTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVRS vs. NXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
NXTG
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IVRS
NXTG
Communication Services
IVRS
NXTG
Financial Services
IVRS
NXTG
-
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
NXTG
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
NXTG
-
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
NXTG
-
Energy
IVRS
-
NXTG
-
Healthcare
IVRS
-
NXTG
-
Industrials
IVRS
-
NXTG
Real Estate
IVRS
-
NXTG
Utilities
IVRS
-
NXTG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
NXTG
IVRS vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVRS | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.77 | -0.76 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | 8.10 | -8.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.08 | 31.73 | -31.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVRS | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 4.52 | -4.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.69 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum NXTG drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and NXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -33.61% | +2.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -10.28% | -21.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -17.75% | -13.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.72% | -0.82% | -17.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -7.87% | +2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.55% | 2.62% | +11.93% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) is 5.53%, while First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) has a volatility of 8.27%. This indicates that IVRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.53% | 8.27% | -2.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 15.26% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.85% | 18.44% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 17.93% | +2.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 18.88% | +1.61% |
IVRS vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, more than NXTG's 1.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.34% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 1.11% | 1.56% | 1.51% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.97% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 1.27% | 1.65% | 1.23% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and NXTG have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NXTG has higher volatility (8.27%) compared to IVRS (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs NXTG's -33.61%.
On 3-year performance, NXTG leads with 35.56% vs 9.46% for IVRS. On fees, IVRS is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, NXTG has performed better with a 35.56% return vs 9.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVRS is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 1.11% for NXTG.
IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.70% for NXTG.
NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs -0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and NXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer