PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NXTG vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NXTG vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NXTG achieves a 55.82% return, which is significantly higher than XLK's 37.85% return. Over the past 10 years, NXTG has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 18.04%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 25.97% annualized return.


NXTG

1D
2.85%
1M
23.47%
YTD
55.82%
6M
57.49%
1Y
85.72%
3Y*
35.94%
5Y*
19.71%
10Y*
18.04%

XLK

1D
1.25%
1M
22.45%
YTD
37.85%
6M
37.41%
1Y
71.15%
3Y*
34.35%
5Y*
24.55%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NXTG vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
55.82%28.46%12.85%28.74%-24.70%21.81%27.58%29.58%-17.25%28.02%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
37.85%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between NXTG and XLK is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2011

0.72

The correlation between NXTG and XLK shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

NXTG vs. XLK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
NXTG
XLK

Technology

66.1%
99.7%

Communication Services

21.7%

-

Real Estate

7.5%

-

Industrials

4.3%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

0.4%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

0.2%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

NXTG
66.1%
XLK
99.7%

Communication Services

NXTG
21.7%
XLK

-

Real Estate

NXTG
7.5%
XLK

-

Industrials

NXTG
4.3%
XLK
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

NXTG
0.4%
XLK

-

Basic Materials

NXTG

-

XLK

-

Consumer Defensive

NXTG

-

XLK

-

Energy

NXTG

-

XLK
0.2%

Financial Services

NXTG

-

XLK

-

Healthcare

NXTG

-

XLK

-

Utilities

NXTG

-

XLK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NXTG vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NXTG
NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NXTG vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NXTGXLKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.68

3.44

+1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.85

4.12

+1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.80

1.55

+0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.51

4.56

+3.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

33.39

15.32

+18.06

NXTG vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NXTG Sharpe Ratio is 4.68, which is higher than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NXTG and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NXTGXLKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.68

3.44

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.10

0.99

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

1.06

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.42

+0.27

Drawdowns

NXTG vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NXTG drawdown since its inception was -33.61%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NXTG and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NXTGXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.61%

-82.05%

+48.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.28%

-15.92%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.75%

-25.66%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

-33.56%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

-33.56%

-0.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.88%

-34.96%

+27.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.62%

4.74%

-2.12%

Volatility

NXTG vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) has a higher volatility of 8.17% compared to State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) at 6.74%. This indicates that NXTG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NXTGXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.17%

6.74%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

16.64%

-1.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.42%

20.80%

-2.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.93%

24.90%

-6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.88%

24.49%

-5.61%

NXTG vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison

NXTG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

NXTG vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

NXTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, more than XLK's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
1.10%1.56%1.51%2.15%2.04%1.97%1.04%0.77%1.27%1.65%1.23%1.11%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.39%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


NXTG and XLK have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTG has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to XLK (6.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NXTG dropped -33.61% vs XLK's -82.05%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.97% vs 18.04% for NXTG. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLK has been the lower-risk option at 6.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.97% return vs 18.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.

NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.39% for XLK.

NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index, while XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for NXTG and 0.08% for XLK.

NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.68 vs 3.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NXTG and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer