IVRS vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVRS is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 7.39%/yr vs 19.40%/yr for IWM. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

IVRS vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -10.47% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 21.03% return.

IVRS

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: -6.24%
• YTD: -10.47%
• 6M: -12.42%
• 1Y: -9.78%
• 3Y*: 7.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.31%
• YTD: 21.03%
• 6M: 17.89%
• 1Y: 39.77%
• 3Y*: 19.40%
• 5Y*: 6.33%
• 10Y*: 11.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRS vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	-10.47%	12.75%	7.40%	28.15%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	21.03%	12.66%	11.38%	4.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and IWM is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023	0.67

The correlation between IVRS and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVRS vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IVRS	IWM
Technology	51.6%	20.1%
Communication Services	28.5%	1.7%
Financial Services	19.9%	15.5%
Consumer Cyclical	3.1%	8.0%
Basic Materials	-	4.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.0%
Energy	-	6.0%
Healthcare	-	15.6%
Industrials	-	17.3%
Real Estate	-	5.5%
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

IVRS vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRS

IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 6
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 6

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 70
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 61
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRS vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IVRS	IWM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.43	2.03	-2.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.45	2.80	-3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	1.33	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.31	3.62	-3.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.64	12.82	-13.46

IVRS vs. IWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.43, which is lower than the IWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRS and IWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	IVRS	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.43%	-59.05%	+27.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.43%	-11.03%	-20.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.43%	-27.50%	-3.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.98%	-0.50%	-22.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.05%	-10.74%	+4.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.36%	3.11%	+12.25%

Volatility

IVRS vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) at 6.52%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IVRS	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.14%	6.52%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.86%	14.30%	+5.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.81%	19.71%	+3.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.71%	22.60%	-1.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.71%	23.06%	-2.35%

IVRS vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

IVRS vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.95%, more than IWM's 0.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF	8.95%	7.88%	6.65%	0.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.90%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IVRS and IWM in my portfolio?

IVRS and IWM have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IVRS or IWM?

IVRS has higher volatility (8.14%) compared to IWM (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs IWM's -59.05%.

Which ETF is better, IVRS or IWM?

On 3-year performance, IWM leads with 19.40% vs 7.39% for IVRS. On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWM has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IVRS or IWM?

Over the 3-year period, IWM has performed better with a 19.40% return vs 7.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IVRS or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IVRS or IWM?

IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.95%, compared with 0.90% for IWM.

What is the main difference between IVRS and IWM?

IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.19% for IWM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.