IVRS vs. IDGT
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) are both Technology Equities funds from iShares - IVRS tracks the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net while IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 7.73%/yr vs 22.17%/yr for IDGT. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IDGT.
Performance
IVRS vs. IDGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than IDGT's 35.87% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 1Y
- -11.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
IDGT
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 32.35%
- YTD
- 35.87%
- 1Y
- 40.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.93%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.41M | $4.29M | $8.06M | |
| $45.64K | $34.99K | $21.63K |
IVRS vs. IDGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -7.07% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 35.87% | 6.79% | 26.71% | -8.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and IDGT is 0.53, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between IVRS and IDGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVRS vs. IDGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
IDGT
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
IVRS
IDGT
Technology
IVRS
IDGT
Financial Services
IVRS
IDGT
-
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
IDGT
-
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
IDGT
-
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
IDGT
-
Energy
IVRS
-
IDGT
-
Healthcare
IVRS
-
IDGT
-
Industrials
IVRS
-
IDGT
-
Real Estate
IVRS
-
IDGT
Utilities
IVRS
-
IDGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. IDGT — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
IDGT
IVRS vs. IDGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRS | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.31 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 2.40 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 7.83 | -8.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. IDGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum IDGT drawdown of -77.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and IDGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -77.95% | +46.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -16.93% | -14.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -22.76% | -8.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.06% | -13.10% | -6.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -19.85% | +13.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.79% | 5.17% | +11.62% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. IDGT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) at 6.90%. This indicates that IVRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | IDGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 6.90% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.96% | 18.77% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 22.41% | +1.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 23.49% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 23.35% | -2.47% |
IVRS vs. IDGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IDGT's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. IDGT - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than IDGT's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.79% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.62% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and IDGT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVRS has higher volatility (7.97%) compared to IDGT (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs IDGT's -77.95%.
On 3-year performance, IDGT leads with 22.17% vs 7.73% for IVRS. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 22.17% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDGT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.62%, compared with 0.79% for IDGT.
IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.39% for IDGT.
IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and IDGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer