IDGT vs. VPN
IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) and VPN (Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IDGT tracks the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross while VPN tracks the Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDGT returned 12.59%/yr vs 15.43%/yr for VPN. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDGT charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for VPN.
Performance
IDGT vs. VPN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 48.60% return, which is significantly lower than VPN's 53.84% return.
IDGT
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 48.60%
- 6M
- 47.03%
- 1Y
- 58.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.61%
VPN
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- 6.53%
- YTD
- 53.84%
- 6M
- 55.86%
- 1Y
- 81.04%
- 3Y*
- 36.86%
- 5Y*
- 15.43%
- 10Y*
- —
IDGT vs. VPN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 48.60% | 6.79% | 26.71% | -6.09% | -17.90% | 42.14% | 25.82% |
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 53.84% | 28.99% | 14.92% | 18.93% | -30.89% | 20.35% | 6.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDGT and VPN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IDGT and VPN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDGT vs. VPN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDGT
VPN
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
IDGT
VPN
Real Estate
IDGT
VPN
Communication Services
IDGT
VPN
Basic Materials
IDGT
-
VPN
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDGT
-
VPN
-
Consumer Defensive
IDGT
-
VPN
-
Energy
IDGT
-
VPN
-
Financial Services
IDGT
-
VPN
Healthcare
IDGT
-
VPN
-
Industrials
IDGT
-
VPN
-
Utilities
IDGT
-
VPN
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDGT vs. VPN — Risk / Return Rank
IDGT
VPN
IDGT vs. VPN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDGT | VPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.55 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.49 | 6.32 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.73 | 19.47 | -0.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDGT vs. VPN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than VPN's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and VPN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDGT | VPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.95% | -38.98% | -38.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -12.89% | +3.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.74% | -24.96% | +1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.83% | -38.98% | +3.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | 0.00% | -4.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -12.28% | -7.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 4.18% | -1.06% |
Volatility
IDGT vs. VPN - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF (VPN) have volatilities of 9.03% and 9.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDGT | VPN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 9.19% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.48% | 18.21% | -0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 23.08% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 22.11% | +1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 22.07% | +1.31% |
IDGT vs. VPN - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDGT has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than VPN's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDGT vs. VPN - Dividend Comparison
IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, more than VPN's 0.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
VPN Global X Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure ETF | 0.71% | 1.10% | 1.72% | 1.18% | 2.57% | 1.27% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDGT and VPN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VPN has higher volatility (9.19%) compared to IDGT (9.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDGT dropped -77.95% vs VPN's -38.98%.
On 5-year performance, VPN leads with 15.43% vs 12.59% for IDGT. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 9.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VPN has performed better with a 15.43% return vs 12.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDGT is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for VPN.
IDGT and VPN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.72%.
IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VPN tracks Solactive Data Center REITs & Digital Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for IDGT and 0.50% for VPN.
VPN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.54 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDGT and VPN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer