PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVRS vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVRS vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -5.51% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -25.48% return.


IVRS

1D
-2.21%
1M
1.13%
YTD
-5.51%
6M
-8.57%
1Y
-1.11%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.76%
1M
-18.50%
YTD
-25.48%
6M
-29.84%
1Y
-38.74%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVRS vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
-5.51%12.75%9.67%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-25.48%-6.41%99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IVRS and IBIT is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.43

The correlation between IVRS and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVRS vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVRS
IVRS Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IVRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVRS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IVRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVRS Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVRS vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVRSIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

0.86

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.04

-0.79

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.08

-1.36

+1.29

IVRS vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVRS Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVRS and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVRSIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

-0.89

+0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.61

0.30

+0.31

Drawdowns

IVRS vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVRSIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.43%

-49.36%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.43%

-49.36%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.72%

-48.10%

+29.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-16.02%

+10.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

14.55%

28.44%

-13.89%

Volatility

IVRS vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) is 5.53%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.50%. This indicates that IVRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVRSIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.53%

9.50%

-3.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.59%

34.44%

-15.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.85%

43.73%

-21.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.49%

50.19%

-29.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.49%

50.19%

-29.70%

IVRS vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

IVRS vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.34%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVRS
iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF
8.34%7.88%6.65%0.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVRS and IBIT have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IBIT has higher volatility (9.50%) compared to IVRS (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

On 1-year performance, IVRS leads with -1.11% vs -38.74% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 5.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IVRS has performed better with a -1.11% return vs -38.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.

IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.34%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

IVRS is categorized as Technology Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.25% for IBIT.

IVRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVRS and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer