IVRS vs. FTEC
IVRS (iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - IVRS tracks the Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net while FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IVRS returned 7.73%/yr vs 29.49%/yr for FTEC. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IVRS charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
IVRS vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVRS achieves a -7.07% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 22.53% return.
IVRS
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- 6M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- -7.07%
- 1Y
- -11.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.73%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.16%
FTEC
- 1D
- 1.71%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 22.49%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 1Y
- 37.50%
- 3Y*
- 29.49%
- 5Y*
- 18.32%
- 10Y*
- 23.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.60%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $86.23M | $78.73M | $94.95M | |
| $45.64K | $34.99K | $21.63K |
IVRS vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | -7.07% | 12.75% | 7.40% | 28.15% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 22.53% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 31.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVRS and FTEC is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between IVRS and FTEC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVRS vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVRS
FTEC
Communication Services
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Communication Services
IVRS
FTEC
Technology
IVRS
FTEC
Financial Services
IVRS
FTEC
Consumer Cyclical
IVRS
FTEC
Basic Materials
IVRS
-
FTEC
Consumer Defensive
IVRS
-
FTEC
-
Energy
IVRS
-
FTEC
Healthcare
IVRS
-
FTEC
-
Industrials
IVRS
-
FTEC
Real Estate
IVRS
-
FTEC
-
Utilities
IVRS
-
FTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVRS vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
IVRS
FTEC
IVRS vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVRS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.26 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.37 | 2.32 | -2.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | 6.23 | -6.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVRS vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVRS drawdown since its inception was -31.43%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVRS and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVRS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.43% | -34.95% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.43% | -16.26% | -15.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.43% | -27.30% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.06% | -8.48% | -11.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.51% | -5.59% | -0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.79% | 6.04% | +10.75% |
Volatility
IVRS vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF (IVRS) is 7.97%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that IVRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVRS | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 8.41% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.96% | 20.16% | -0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.89% | 24.30% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 25.89% | -5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.88% | 24.99% | -4.11% |
IVRS vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVRS has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVRS vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
IVRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.62%, more than FTEC's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
IVRS iShares Future Metaverse Tech And Communications ETF | 8.62% | 7.88% | 6.65% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVRS and FTEC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTEC has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to IVRS (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVRS dropped -31.43% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 3-year performance, FTEC leads with 29.49% vs 7.73% for IVRS. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IVRS has been the lower-risk option at 7.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 29.49% return vs 7.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IVRS.
IVRS has the higher dividend yield at 8.62%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.
IVRS tracks Morningstar Global Metaverse & Virtual Interaction Select Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IVRS and 0.08% for FTEC.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVRS and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer