PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOV has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 10.41%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.56% annualized return.


IVOV

1D
-0.30%
1M
1.86%
YTD
8.98%
6M
9.21%
1Y
20.80%
3Y*
13.95%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
10.41%

VOO

1D
-0.70%
1M
5.04%
YTD
10.91%
6M
10.93%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.44%
5Y*
13.90%
10Y*
15.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
8.98%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
10.91%17.82%24.98%26.32%-18.17%28.79%18.32%31.37%-4.50%21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and VOO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.77

The correlation between IVOV and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVOV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
VOO

Financial Services

21.9%
11.6%

Industrials

18.8%
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
10.2%

Real Estate

9.6%
1.9%

Technology

9.2%
35.7%

Energy

7.4%
3.5%

Basic Materials

6.0%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
4.9%

Utilities

4.2%
2.4%

Healthcare

3.5%
8.5%

Communication Services

0.5%
11.3%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.9%
VOO
11.6%

Industrials

IVOV
18.8%
VOO
8.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.5%
VOO
10.2%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.6%
VOO
1.9%

Technology

IVOV
9.2%
VOO
35.7%

Energy

IVOV
7.4%
VOO
3.5%

Basic Materials

IVOV
6.0%
VOO
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
5.5%
VOO
4.9%

Utilities

IVOV
4.2%
VOO
2.4%

Healthcare

IVOV
3.5%
VOO
8.5%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.5%
VOO
11.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOVVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.43

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

3.16

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.80

14.73

-7.93

IVOV vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOVVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.39

-1.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.83

-0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.87

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.89

-0.31

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-33.99%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-8.90%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-18.69%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-24.52%

+1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

-33.99%

-12.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-0.70%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.43%

-3.69%

-1.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.07%

1.91%

+1.16%

Volatility

IVOV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) has a higher volatility of 4.07% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that IVOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.07%

2.84%

+1.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

8.90%

+1.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.27%

11.80%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.48%

16.81%

+2.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

18.01%

+3.72%

IVOV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.67%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOV and VOO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVOV has higher volatility (4.07%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs VOO's -33.99%.

On 10-year performance, VOO leads with 15.56% vs 10.41% for IVOV. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOO has performed better with a 15.56% return vs 10.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.

IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.03% for VOO.

IVOV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.03% for VOO.

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer