IVOV vs. SLYG
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVOV is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while SLYG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOV returned 10.71%/yr vs 11.27%/yr for SLYG. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYG.
Performance
IVOV vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 10.95% return, which is significantly lower than SLYG's 19.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOV has underperformed SLYG with an annualized return of 10.71%, while SLYG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.27% annualized return.
IVOV
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 10.95%
- 6M
- 8.24%
- 1Y
- 21.29%
- 3Y*
- 13.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 10.71%
SLYG
- 1D
- 3.07%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 19.06%
- 6M
- 14.09%
- 1Y
- 28.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.27%
IVOV vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 10.95% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 19.06% | 5.20% | 9.38% | 17.27% | -21.26% | 22.42% | 19.48% | 20.97% | -4.20% | 14.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and SLYG is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.86 |
The correlation between IVOV and SLYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOV vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOV
SLYG
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IVOV
SLYG
Industrials
IVOV
SLYG
Consumer Cyclical
IVOV
SLYG
Real Estate
IVOV
SLYG
Technology
IVOV
SLYG
Energy
IVOV
SLYG
Basic Materials
IVOV
SLYG
Consumer Defensive
IVOV
SLYG
Utilities
IVOV
SLYG
Healthcare
IVOV
SLYG
Communication Services
IVOV
SLYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
SLYG
IVOV vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVOV | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 3.11 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.96 | 10.92 | -3.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum SLYG drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and SLYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -62.92% | +16.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -9.10% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | -27.39% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -29.18% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | -41.86% | -4.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.42% | -14.90% | +9.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.59% | +0.48% |
Volatility
IVOV vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) is 4.08%, while SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) has a volatility of 5.57%. This indicates that IVOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | SLYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 5.57% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.83% | 12.98% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 17.92% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.51% | 21.57% | -2.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 22.76% | -1.03% |
IVOV vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOV vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than SLYG's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF | 0.69% | 0.86% | 1.22% | 1.18% | 1.18% | 0.68% | 0.71% | 1.08% | 1.06% | 4.74% | 1.13% | 5.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, IVOV and SLYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SLYG has higher volatility (5.57%) compared to IVOV (4.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs SLYG's -62.92%.
On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.27% vs 10.71% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.27% return vs 10.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SLYG.
IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.69% for SLYG.
IVOV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SLYG is Small Cap Growth Equities. IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.15% for SLYG.
SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and SLYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer