IVOV vs. RDIV
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - IVOV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOV returned 10.38%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for RDIV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RDIV.
Performance
IVOV vs. RDIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly lower than RDIV's 17.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOV having a 10.38% annualized return and RDIV not far ahead at 10.74%.
IVOV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 1Y
- 16.94%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 10.38%
RDIV
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- YTD
- 17.92%
- 1Y
- 27.02%
- 3Y*
- 19.41%
- 5Y*
- 12.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.74%
IVOV vs. RDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 12.05% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 17.92% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 11.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and RDIV is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.82 |
The correlation between IVOV and RDIV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVOV vs. RDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOV
RDIV
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IVOV
RDIV
Industrials
IVOV
RDIV
-
Consumer Cyclical
IVOV
RDIV
Technology
IVOV
RDIV
Real Estate
IVOV
RDIV
Basic Materials
IVOV
RDIV
Energy
IVOV
RDIV
Consumer Defensive
IVOV
RDIV
Utilities
IVOV
RDIV
Healthcare
IVOV
RDIV
Communication Services
IVOV
RDIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. RDIV — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
RDIV
IVOV vs. RDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVOV | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.36 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 5.60 | -4.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.54 | 16.01 | -10.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. RDIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, smaller than the maximum RDIV drawdown of -49.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and RDIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -49.97% | +3.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -4.84% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | -17.91% | -4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | -24.89% | +2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | -49.97% | +3.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | 0.00% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.40% | -5.82% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 1.69% | +1.37% |
Volatility
IVOV vs. RDIV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) is 3.59%, while Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that IVOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | RDIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 4.72% | -1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 8.82% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.16% | 13.34% | +1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.35% | 17.44% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.65% | 21.84% | -0.19% |
IVOV vs. RDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than RDIV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOV vs. RDIV - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than RDIV's 3.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.59% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOV and RDIV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to IVOV (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs RDIV's -49.97%.
On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 10.74% vs 10.38% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 10.74% return vs 10.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 1.63% for IVOV.
IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and RDIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer