IVOV vs. COWS
IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) and COWS (Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - IVOV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index while COWS tracks the Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IVOV returned 20.80% vs 30.18% for COWS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for COWS.
Performance
IVOV vs. COWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IVOV having a 8.98% return and COWS slightly higher at 9.22%.
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.86%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 20.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
COWS
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 9.22%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVOV vs. COWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 8.98% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 11.12% |
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 9.22% | 15.29% | 11.08% | 9.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOV and COWS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between IVOV and COWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVOV vs. COWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOV
COWS
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Healthcare
Communication Services
Financial Services
IVOV
COWS
Industrials
IVOV
COWS
Consumer Cyclical
IVOV
COWS
Real Estate
IVOV
COWS
-
Technology
IVOV
COWS
Energy
IVOV
COWS
Basic Materials
IVOV
COWS
Consumer Defensive
IVOV
COWS
Utilities
IVOV
COWS
Healthcare
IVOV
COWS
Communication Services
IVOV
COWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOV vs. COWS — Risk / Return Rank
IVOV
COWS
IVOV vs. COWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOV | COWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.37 | 1.88 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.08 | 2.76 | -0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.33 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 4.71 | -2.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.80 | 14.35 | -7.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOV | COWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.37 | 1.88 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.90 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
IVOV vs. COWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, which is greater than COWS's maximum drawdown of -24.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and COWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOV | COWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.99% | -24.76% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.58% | -6.44% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.61% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.90% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -3.95% | -1.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.07% | 2.11% | +0.96% |
Volatility
IVOV vs. COWS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) is 4.07%, while Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that IVOV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOV | COWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 4.58% | -0.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.61% | 10.09% | +0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.27% | 16.21% | -0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 18.85% | +0.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 18.85% | +2.88% |
IVOV vs. COWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than COWS's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IVOV vs. COWS - Dividend Comparison
IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than COWS's 1.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 1.60% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.67% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOV and COWS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COWS has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to IVOV (4.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs COWS's -24.76%.
On 1-year performance, COWS leads with 30.18% vs 20.80% for IVOV. On fees, COWS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 4.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COWS has performed better with a 30.18% return vs 20.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IVOV.
IVOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 1.60% for COWS.
IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while COWS tracks Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.00% for COWS.
COWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOV and COWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer