COWS vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
COWS and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COWS is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2023. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016. Both COWS and COWZ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COWS vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COWS vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | -0.53% | 15.29% | 11.08% | 9.28% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 4.30% | 8.98% | 10.64% | 3.77% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWS achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 4.30% return.
COWS
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 4.15%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- YTD
- 4.30%
- 6M
- 10.31%
- 1Y
- 16.75%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 11.01%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COWS vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
COWS vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
COWS
COWZ
COWS vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWS | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.96 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.44 | -0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 1.30 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 6.06 | -0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWS | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.96 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.63 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between COWS and COWZ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
COWS vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
COWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than COWZ's 2.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 1.77% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.06% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
COWS vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and COWZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWS | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.76% | -38.63% | +13.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.70% | -13.55% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -3.36% | -1.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -4.85% | +0.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 2.91% | +0.91% |
Volatility
COWS vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) has a higher volatility of 4.20% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 3.00%. This indicates that COWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COWS | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 3.00% | +1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 8.36% | +3.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.88% | 17.50% | +5.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 17.73% | +1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 20.08% | -0.98% |