COWS vs. SCHD
COWS (Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - COWS is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, COWS returned 30.18% vs 27.16% for SCHD. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. COWS charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
COWS vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWS achieves a 9.22% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 19.01% return.
COWS
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 9.22%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 30.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
COWS vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 9.22% | 15.29% | 11.08% | 9.28% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between COWS and SCHD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2023 | 0.78 |
The correlation between COWS and SCHD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
COWS vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
COWS
SCHD
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
COWS
SCHD
Industrials
COWS
SCHD
Financial Services
COWS
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
COWS
SCHD
Energy
COWS
SCHD
Healthcare
COWS
SCHD
Basic Materials
COWS
SCHD
Communication Services
COWS
SCHD
Utilities
COWS
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
COWS
SCHD
Real Estate
COWS
-
SCHD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
COWS vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
COWS
SCHD
COWS vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.45 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | 5.91 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 14.53 | -0.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.49 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.86 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
COWS vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum SCHD drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.76% | -33.37% | +8.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.44% | -4.61% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.90% | -1.40% | +0.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -3.32% | -0.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.11% | 1.88% | +0.23% |
Volatility
COWS vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that COWS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| COWS | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 2.66% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.09% | 7.66% | +2.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 10.96% | +5.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 14.38% | +4.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 16.72% | +2.13% |
COWS vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
COWS vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
COWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 1.60% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
COWS and SCHD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COWS has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, COWS dropped -24.76% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 1-year performance, COWS leads with 30.18% vs 27.16% for SCHD. On fees, COWS is cheaper at 0.00% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, COWS has performed better with a 30.18% return vs 27.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
COWS is cheaper with a 0.00% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 1.60% for COWS.
COWS is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. COWS tracks Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.00% for COWS and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for COWS and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer