COWS vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
COWS and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. COWS is a passively managed fund by Amplify that tracks the performance of the Kelly US Cash Flow Dividend Leaders Index. It was launched on Sep 12, 2023. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both COWS and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
COWS vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
COWS vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | -0.53% | 15.29% | 11.08% | 9.28% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | -4.42% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 7.29% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, COWS achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's -4.42% return.
COWS
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- -4.77%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 4.15%
- 1Y
- 19.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -5.01%
- YTD
- -4.42%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- 1Y
- 17.67%
- 3Y*
- 18.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
COWS vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
COWS has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
COWS vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
COWS
VOO
COWS vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| COWS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.98 | -0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.32 | 1.50 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.23 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.20 | 1.53 | -0.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.25 | 7.29 | -2.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| COWS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.98 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.83 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between COWS and VOO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
COWS vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
COWS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, more than VOO's 1.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COWS Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF | 1.77% | 2.04% | 2.08% | 0.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.19% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Drawdowns
COWS vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum COWS drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for COWS and VOO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| COWS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.76% | -33.99% | +9.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.70% | -11.98% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -6.29% | +1.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -3.72% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.82% | 2.52% | +1.30% |
Volatility
COWS vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amplify Cash Flow Dividend Leaders ETF (COWS) is 4.20%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that COWS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| COWS | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.20% | 5.29% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 9.44% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.88% | 18.10% | +4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 16.82% | +2.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.10% | 17.99% | +1.11% |