PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOV vs. AUSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOV vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOV achieves a 12.05% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 10.04% return.


IVOV

1D
0.01%
1M
0.08%
6M
7.21%
YTD
12.05%
1Y
16.94%
3Y*
12.31%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
10.38%

AUSF

1D
0.56%
1M
0.70%
6M
6.93%
YTD
10.04%
1Y
14.34%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOV vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
12.05%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-17.97%
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
10.04%13.69%16.05%22.26%-0.18%27.48%1.27%24.06%-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOV and AUSF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018

0.87

The correlation between IVOV and AUSF shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IVOV vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOV
AUSF

Financial Services

21.0%
18.4%

Industrials

17.1%
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.7%
9.3%

Technology

10.0%
15.3%

Real Estate

9.5%
4.6%

Basic Materials

7.9%
2.6%

Energy

7.3%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
7.8%

Utilities

4.0%
4.4%

Healthcare

3.8%
11.4%

Communication Services

0.5%
8.6%

Financial Services

IVOV
21.0%
AUSF
18.4%

Industrials

IVOV
17.1%
AUSF
14.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOV
13.7%
AUSF
9.3%

Technology

IVOV
10.0%
AUSF
15.3%

Real Estate

IVOV
9.5%
AUSF
4.6%

Basic Materials

IVOV
7.9%
AUSF
2.6%

Energy

IVOV
7.3%
AUSF
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

IVOV
4.9%
AUSF
7.8%

Utilities

IVOV
4.0%
AUSF
4.4%

Healthcare

IVOV
3.8%
AUSF
11.4%

Communication Services

IVOV
0.5%
AUSF
8.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOV vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

AUSF
AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOV vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IVOVAUSFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

2.46

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.54

6.99

-1.45

IVOV vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOV Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOV and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IVOV vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOV drawdown since its inception was -45.99%, roughly equal to the maximum AUSF drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOV and AUSF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOVAUSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.99%

-44.25%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.58%

-5.84%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.61%

-12.29%

-10.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.61%

-14.23%

-8.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

0.00%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.40%

-4.18%

-1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.06%

2.06%

+1.00%

Volatility

IVOV vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.70%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOVAUSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.70%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.49%

7.10%

+3.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.16%

10.35%

+4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.35%

13.62%

+5.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.65%

18.99%

+2.66%

IVOV vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOV vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

IVOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than AUSF's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
2.67%2.78%2.63%1.83%2.51%2.22%2.95%4.02%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.63%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


IVOV and AUSF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AUSF has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to IVOV (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOV dropped -45.99% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 14.15% vs 9.17% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 14.15% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for AUSF.

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 1.63% for IVOV.

IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for IVOV and 0.27% for AUSF.

AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOV and AUSF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer