IVOO vs. PWC
IVOO (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF) and PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - IVOO tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index while PWC tracks the Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVOO returned 11.59%/yr vs 9.67%/yr for PWC. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IVOO charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PWC.
Performance
IVOO vs. PWC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly higher than PWC's 5.50% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOO has outperformed PWC with an annualized return of 11.59%, while PWC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.67% annualized return.
IVOO
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 14.65%
- 6M
- 12.56%
- 1Y
- 25.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.08%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
PWC
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- -1.43%
- YTD
- 5.50%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 8.55%
- 3Y*
- 13.17%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.67%
IVOO vs. PWC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 14.65% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 24.61% | 13.61% | 26.18% | -11.33% | 16.38% |
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 5.50% | 6.15% | 17.46% | 19.03% | -16.01% | 19.38% | 8.52% | 13.47% | -6.40% | 20.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOO and PWC is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IVOO and PWC shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.85 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IVOO vs. PWC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVOO
PWC
Industrials
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Industrials
IVOO
PWC
Technology
IVOO
PWC
Financial Services
IVOO
PWC
Consumer Cyclical
IVOO
PWC
Healthcare
IVOO
PWC
Real Estate
IVOO
PWC
Energy
IVOO
PWC
Basic Materials
IVOO
PWC
Consumer Defensive
IVOO
PWC
Utilities
IVOO
PWC
Communication Services
IVOO
PWC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVOO vs. PWC — Risk / Return Rank
IVOO
PWC
IVOO vs. PWC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVOO | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.15 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 1.33 | +1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.47 | 3.99 | +6.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVOO vs. PWC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum PWC drawdown of -78.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and PWC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOO | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.33% | -78.13% | +35.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.81% | -6.45% | -2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.22% | -15.12% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -26.58% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -39.45% | -2.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -2.69% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.25% | -36.13% | +30.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 2.15% | +0.26% |
Volatility
IVOO vs. PWC - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) at 2.87%. This indicates that IVOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVOO | PWC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | 2.87% | +1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 7.29% | +4.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.89% | 9.86% | +6.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 16.03% | +3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 18.79% | +2.40% |
IVOO vs. PWC - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOO has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than PWC's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVOO vs. PWC - Dividend Comparison
IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than PWC's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF | 1.80% | 1.77% | 1.58% | 1.67% | 1.51% | 0.56% | 1.09% | 0.95% | 1.44% | 1.75% | 1.35% | 1.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVOO and PWC have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVOO has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to PWC (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOO dropped -42.33% vs PWC's -78.13%.
On 10-year performance, IVOO leads with 11.59% vs 9.67% for PWC. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PWC has been the lower-risk option at 2.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVOO has performed better with a 11.59% return vs 9.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PWC.
PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.19% for IVOO.
IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index, while PWC tracks Dynamic Market Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IVOO and 0.60% for PWC.
IVOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVOO and PWC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer