IVOO vs. BIAPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX).
IVOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. BIAPX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 20, 2006.
Performance
IVOO vs. BIAPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IVOO vs. BIAPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 2.57% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 24.61% | 13.61% | 26.18% | -11.33% | 16.38% |
BIAPX BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund | -4.85% | 18.33% | 5.46% | 19.20% | -16.15% | 14.95% | 19.50% | 24.72% | -7.62% | 17.47% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVOO achieves a 2.57% return, which is significantly higher than BIAPX's -4.85% return. Over the past 10 years, IVOO has outperformed BIAPX with an annualized return of 10.44%, while BIAPX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.03% annualized return.
IVOO
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -5.28%
- YTD
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 17.42%
- 3Y*
- 12.05%
- 5Y*
- 6.55%
- 10Y*
- 10.44%
BIAPX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -7.98%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -2.53%
- 1Y
- 14.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.49%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IVOO vs. BIAPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IVOO and BIAPX have an expense ratio of 0.10%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
IVOO vs. BIAPX — Risk / Return Rank
IVOO
BIAPX
IVOO vs. BIAPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) and BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IVOO | BIAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.82 | 1.03 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.30 | 1.54 | -0.24 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.23 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.38 | 5.85 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IVOO | BIAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 | 1.03 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.39 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.65 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.40 | +0.18 |
Correlation
The correlation between IVOO and BIAPX is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IVOO vs. BIAPX - Dividend Comparison
IVOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than BIAPX's 6.29% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.32% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
BIAPX BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund | 6.29% | 5.98% | 0.00% | 4.28% | 2.30% | 6.04% | 2.07% | 2.49% | 6.26% | 3.12% | 1.67% | 13.86% |
Drawdowns
IVOO vs. BIAPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOO drawdown since its inception was -42.33%, smaller than the maximum BIAPX drawdown of -53.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOO and BIAPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVOO | BIAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.33% | -53.40% | +11.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.17% | -9.92% | -4.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.22% | -23.29% | -0.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.33% | -27.13% | -15.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.10% | -8.64% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.31% | -8.06% | +2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.27% | 2.23% | +1.04% |
Volatility
IVOO vs. BIAPX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) at 4.76%. This indicates that IVOO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIAPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IVOO | BIAPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.56% | 4.76% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.90% | 8.10% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.22% | 14.68% | +6.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 14.39% | +5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.17% | 13.94% | +7.23% |