PortfoliosLab logo
BIAPX vs. SCGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BIAPX and SCGRX is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

BIAPX vs. SCGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) and Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund (SCGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%60.00%70.00%80.00%90.00%100.00%110.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
86.26%
61.37%
BIAPX
SCGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BIAPX:

0.07

SCGRX:

0.17

Sortino Ratio

BIAPX:

0.21

SCGRX:

0.34

Omega Ratio

BIAPX:

1.03

SCGRX:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

BIAPX:

0.06

SCGRX:

0.15

Martin Ratio

BIAPX:

0.20

SCGRX:

0.55

Ulcer Index

BIAPX:

6.08%

SCGRX:

4.63%

Daily Std Dev

BIAPX:

16.66%

SCGRX:

15.03%

Max Drawdown

BIAPX:

-54.63%

SCGRX:

-47.11%

Current Drawdown

BIAPX:

-11.62%

SCGRX:

-9.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BIAPX achieves a -2.08% return, which is significantly higher than SCGRX's -2.34% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAPX has outperformed SCGRX with an annualized return of 4.27%, while SCGRX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.01% annualized return.


BIAPX

YTD

-2.08%

1M

-1.44%

6M

-8.53%

1Y

0.71%

5Y*

8.00%

10Y*

4.27%

SCGRX

YTD

-2.34%

1M

-1.87%

6M

-5.42%

1Y

2.43%

5Y*

5.36%

10Y*

1.01%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


BIAPX vs. SCGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BIAPX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than SCGRX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Expense ratio chart for SCGRX: current value is 0.43%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
SCGRX: 0.43%
Expense ratio chart for BIAPX: current value is 0.10%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
BIAPX: 0.10%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BIAPX vs. SCGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BIAPX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BIAPX is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BIAPX is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BIAPX is 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BIAPX is 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BIAPX is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BIAPX is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

SCGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SCGRX is 3434
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SCGRX is 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SCGRX is 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SCGRX is 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SCGRX is 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SCGRX is 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BIAPX vs. SCGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) and Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund (SCGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for BIAPX, currently valued at 0.07, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
BIAPX: 0.07
SCGRX: 0.17
The chart of Sortino ratio for BIAPX, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
BIAPX: 0.21
SCGRX: 0.34
The chart of Omega ratio for BIAPX, currently valued at 1.03, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
BIAPX: 1.03
SCGRX: 1.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for BIAPX, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
BIAPX: 0.06
SCGRX: 0.15
The chart of Martin ratio for BIAPX, currently valued at 0.20, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
BIAPX: 0.20
SCGRX: 0.55

The current BIAPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the SCGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAPX and SCGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.07
0.17
BIAPX
SCGRX

Dividends

BIAPX vs. SCGRX - Dividend Comparison

BIAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than SCGRX's 1.66% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
BIAPX
BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund
1.93%1.89%1.94%1.99%1.87%1.11%2.01%1.45%1.77%1.67%1.78%3.76%
SCGRX
Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund
1.66%1.62%1.46%1.82%3.67%1.24%1.85%2.42%1.53%1.51%1.35%1.57%

Drawdowns

BIAPX vs. SCGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BIAPX drawdown since its inception was -54.63%, which is greater than SCGRX's maximum drawdown of -47.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAPX and SCGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-11.62%
-9.26%
BIAPX
SCGRX

Volatility

BIAPX vs. SCGRX - Volatility Comparison

BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) has a higher volatility of 11.04% compared to Franklin Multi-Asset Moderate Growth Fund (SCGRX) at 10.33%. This indicates that BIAPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
11.04%
10.33%
BIAPX
SCGRX