BIAPX vs. VT

In the year-to-date period, BIAPX achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, BIAPX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 8.13%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.11% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

BIAPX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current BIAPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.58, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BIAPX and VT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

BIAPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.58%, more than VT's 1.85% yield.

The maximum BIAPX drawdown since its inception was -52.80%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BIAPX and VT.

The current volatility for BlackRock 80/20 Target Allocation Fund (BIAPX) is 3.12%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that BIAPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.