PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IVOG vs. ISCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IVOG vs. ISCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IVOG achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly higher than ISCG's 12.92% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOG having a 11.61% annualized return and ISCG not far behind at 11.37%.


IVOG

1D
0.27%
1M
5.95%
YTD
19.25%
6M
19.31%
1Y
30.31%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
11.61%

ISCG

1D
-0.93%
1M
3.29%
YTD
12.92%
6M
12.57%
1Y
30.64%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
5.31%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IVOG vs. ISCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
19.25%7.34%15.62%17.36%-19.08%18.85%22.60%26.13%-10.58%19.90%
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
12.92%12.88%13.35%23.13%-26.75%-1.26%43.41%27.66%-6.91%24.68%

Correlation

The correlation between IVOG and ISCG is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.90

The correlation between IVOG and ISCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IVOG vs. ISCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IVOG
ISCG

Industrials

30.9%
24.6%

Technology

21.9%
21.4%

Healthcare

13.5%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
9.9%

Financial Services

7.3%
10.6%

Real Estate

5.5%
5.2%

Energy

3.7%
2.8%

Basic Materials

3.6%
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.1%
2.9%

Utilities

2.0%
1.0%

Communication Services

1.5%
2.8%

Industrials

IVOG
30.9%
ISCG
24.6%

Technology

IVOG
21.9%
ISCG
21.4%

Healthcare

IVOG
13.5%
ISCG
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IVOG
8.0%
ISCG
9.9%

Financial Services

IVOG
7.3%
ISCG
10.6%

Real Estate

IVOG
5.5%
ISCG
5.2%

Energy

IVOG
3.7%
ISCG
2.8%

Basic Materials

IVOG
3.6%
ISCG
3.5%

Consumer Defensive

IVOG
2.1%
ISCG
2.9%

Utilities

IVOG
2.0%
ISCG
1.0%

Communication Services

IVOG
1.5%
ISCG
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IVOG vs. ISCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IVOG
IVOG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IVOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOG Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOG Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCG
ISCG Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ISCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCG Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IVOG vs. ISCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IVOGISCGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.78

1.70

+0.08

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

2.40

+0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.29

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.69

+0.45

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.34

10.31

+2.03

IVOG vs. ISCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IVOG Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the ISCG Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IVOG and ISCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IVOGISCGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.78

1.70

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.23

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.49

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.41

+0.23

Drawdowns

IVOG vs. ISCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IVOG drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum ISCG drawdown of -57.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOG and ISCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IVOGISCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.32%

-57.72%

+18.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-11.43%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.61%

-26.71%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.31%

-37.80%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.32%

-41.48%

+2.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.93%

+0.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.88%

-11.63%

+5.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.46%

2.98%

-0.52%

Volatility

IVOG vs. ISCG - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) at 4.93%. This indicates that IVOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IVOGISCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

4.93%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.19%

13.09%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.14%

18.13%

-0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.61%

22.95%

-2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.59%

23.16%

-2.57%

IVOG vs. ISCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

IVOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IVOG vs. ISCG - Dividend Comparison

IVOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.54%, less than ISCG's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCG
iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF
0.56%0.61%0.84%0.77%0.92%0.62%0.10%0.27%0.40%0.52%1.19%0.64%
IVOG
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
0.54%0.64%0.79%1.15%1.05%0.47%0.74%1.17%1.01%0.93%1.11%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, IVOG and ISCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IVOG has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to ISCG (4.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVOG dropped -39.32% vs ISCG's -57.72%.

On 10-year performance, IVOG leads with 11.61% vs 11.37% for ISCG. On fees, ISCG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ISCG has been the lower-risk option at 4.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVOG has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 11.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IVOG.

ISCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.54% for IVOG.

IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index, while ISCG tracks Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for IVOG and 0.06% for ISCG.

IVOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IVOG and ISCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer