IVOG vs. VO
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO).
IVOG and VO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IVOG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. VO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. It was launched on Jan 26, 2004. Both IVOG and VO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IVOG or VO.
Correlation
The correlation between IVOG and VO is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IVOG vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IVOG:
1.12
VO:
1.56
IVOG:
1.62
VO:
2.15
IVOG:
1.20
VO:
1.27
IVOG:
1.76
VO:
1.88
IVOG:
5.63
VO:
8.76
IVOG:
3.28%
VO:
2.23%
IVOG:
16.54%
VO:
12.55%
IVOG:
-39.32%
VO:
-58.88%
IVOG:
-7.60%
VO:
-5.87%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IVOG having a 16.61% return and VO slightly higher at 16.91%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVOG having a 9.75% annualized return and VO not far behind at 9.64%.
IVOG
16.61%
-3.07%
4.20%
16.71%
10.06%
9.75%
VO
16.91%
-4.07%
11.14%
17.45%
10.28%
9.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IVOG vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVOG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IVOG vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IVOG vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
IVOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 0.00% | 1.15% | 1.05% | 0.47% | 0.74% | 1.17% | 1.01% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.04% | 0.81% | 0.66% |
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.42% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% | 1.29% | 1.18% |
Drawdowns
IVOG vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVOG drawdown since its inception was -39.32%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVOG and VO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IVOG vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.72%. This indicates that IVOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.