IVLU vs. VO
IVLU (iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF) and VO (Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IVLU is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index, while VO is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IVLU returned 11.63%/yr vs 11.77%/yr for VO. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IVLU charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VO.
Performance
IVLU vs. VO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IVLU achieves a 12.96% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.43% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IVLU having a 11.63% annualized return and VO not far ahead at 11.77%.
IVLU
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 2.48%
- YTD
- 12.96%
- 6M
- 14.33%
- 1Y
- 35.32%
- 3Y*
- 23.53%
- 5Y*
- 14.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
VO
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.30%
- YTD
- 10.43%
- 6M
- 9.31%
- 1Y
- 19.60%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.77%
IVLU vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVLU iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF | 12.96% | 46.09% | 6.76% | 20.07% | -5.73% | 15.60% | -4.50% | 15.60% | -15.10% | 23.10% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 10.43% | 11.62% | 15.31% | 16.03% | -18.73% | 24.70% | 18.10% | 30.98% | -9.24% | 19.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between IVLU and VO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2015 | 0.68 |
The correlation between IVLU and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
IVLU vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IVLU
VO
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IVLU
VO
Industrials
IVLU
VO
Technology
IVLU
VO
Healthcare
IVLU
VO
Consumer Cyclical
IVLU
VO
Basic Materials
IVLU
VO
Consumer Defensive
IVLU
VO
Energy
IVLU
VO
Communication Services
IVLU
VO
Utilities
IVLU
VO
Real Estate
IVLU
VO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IVLU vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank
IVLU
VO
IVLU vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IVLU | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.25 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.23 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | 8.44 | +2.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IVLU vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IVLU drawdown since its inception was -41.85%, smaller than the maximum VO drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IVLU and VO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IVLU | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.85% | -58.87% | +17.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.69% | -8.17% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.48% | -19.02% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -27.57% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.85% | -39.37% | -2.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.45% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -7.85% | -0.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.09% | 2.16% | +0.93% |
Volatility
IVLU vs. VO - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF (IVLU) has a higher volatility of 5.44% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 4.31%. This indicates that IVLU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IVLU | VO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.44% | 4.31% | +1.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.85% | 9.71% | +3.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 12.74% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 17.65% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 18.96% | -1.30% |
IVLU vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IVLU has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
IVLU vs. VO - Dividend Comparison
IVLU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, more than VO's 1.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVLU iShares MSCI International Value Factor ETF | 3.28% | 3.71% | 4.46% | 4.69% | 3.59% | 3.47% | 2.05% | 3.53% | 2.82% | 2.87% | 2.53% | 0.93% |
VO Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF | 1.36% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.12% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.82% | 1.35% | 1.45% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IVLU and VO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IVLU has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to VO (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IVLU dropped -41.85% vs VO's -58.87%.
On 10-year performance, VO leads with 11.77% vs 11.63% for IVLU. On fees, VO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VO has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VO has performed better with a 11.77% return vs 11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IVLU.
IVLU has the higher dividend yield at 3.28%, compared with 1.36% for VO.
IVLU is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VO is Mid Cap Blend Equities. IVLU tracks MSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Index, while VO tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IVLU and 0.03% for VO.
IVLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IVLU and VO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer