IUSG vs. VOO
IUSG (iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IUSG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 3000 Growth Index, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IUSG returned 17.88%/yr vs 15.56%/yr for VOO. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. IUSG charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
IUSG vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 14.08% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 10.91% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 17.88%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.56% annualized return.
IUSG
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 14.08%
- 6M
- 13.91%
- 1Y
- 33.89%
- 3Y*
- 27.59%
- 5Y*
- 15.69%
- 10Y*
- 17.88%
VOO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 5.04%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.93%
- 1Y
- 28.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 13.90%
- 10Y*
- 15.56%
IUSG vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 14.08% | 21.23% | 34.70% | 29.28% | -28.81% | 31.26% | 32.65% | 30.62% | -0.79% | 27.02% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 10.91% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 28.79% | 18.32% | 31.37% | -4.50% | 21.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between IUSG and VOO is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between IUSG and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
IUSG vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IUSG
VOO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Energy
Technology
IUSG
VOO
Communication Services
IUSG
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
IUSG
VOO
Financial Services
IUSG
VOO
Industrials
IUSG
VOO
Healthcare
IUSG
VOO
Consumer Defensive
IUSG
VOO
Real Estate
IUSG
VOO
Basic Materials
IUSG
VOO
Utilities
IUSG
VOO
Energy
IUSG
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IUSG vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
IUSG
VOO
IUSG vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IUSG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.43 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.61 | 3.16 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | 14.73 | -3.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IUSG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.17 | 2.39 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.83 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 | 0.87 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.89 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
IUSG vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IUSG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.41% | -33.99% | -29.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.07% | -8.90% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.28% | -18.69% | -3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.21% | -24.52% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.35% | -33.99% | +1.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.98% | -0.70% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.44% | -3.69% | -17.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.06% | 1.91% | +1.15% |
Volatility
IUSG vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) has a higher volatility of 4.23% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.84%. This indicates that IUSG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IUSG | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.23% | 2.84% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 8.90% | +3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.72% | 11.80% | +3.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.87% | 16.81% | +4.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.40% | 18.01% | +2.39% |
IUSG vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IUSG vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than VOO's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSG iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.53% | 0.59% | 1.12% | 1.07% | 0.59% | 0.93% | 1.64% | 1.32% | 1.28% | 1.48% | 1.29% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IUSG and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IUSG has higher volatility (4.23%) compared to VOO (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.88% vs 15.56% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.88% return vs 15.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for IUSG.
VOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.47% for IUSG.
IUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. IUSG tracks Russell 3000 Growth Index, while VOO tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.03% for VOO.
VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IUSG and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer