PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IUSG vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IUSG vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IUSG achieves a 10.18% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, IUSG has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 17.63%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.


IUSG

1D
0.36%
1M
-0.99%
YTD
10.18%
6M
11.00%
1Y
29.29%
3Y*
25.32%
5Y*
14.55%
10Y*
17.63%

VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
3.58%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IUSG vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
10.18%21.23%34.70%29.28%-28.81%31.26%32.65%30.62%-0.79%27.02%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IUSG and VEA is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2007

0.77

The correlation between IUSG and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IUSG vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IUSG
VEA

Technology

50.5%
13.8%

Communication Services

15.7%
3.4%

Financial Services

8.6%
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
7.5%

Industrials

6.5%
19.2%

Healthcare

6.4%
8.2%

Utilities

1.1%
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
5.6%

Real Estate

0.8%
2.7%

Basic Materials

0.5%
7.5%

Energy

0.3%
5.4%

Technology

IUSG
50.5%
VEA
13.8%

Communication Services

IUSG
15.7%
VEA
3.4%

Financial Services

IUSG
8.6%
VEA
23.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IUSG
8.4%
VEA
7.5%

Industrials

IUSG
6.5%
VEA
19.2%

Healthcare

IUSG
6.4%
VEA
8.2%

Utilities

IUSG
1.1%
VEA
3.3%

Consumer Defensive

IUSG
1.1%
VEA
5.6%

Real Estate

IUSG
0.8%
VEA
2.7%

Basic Materials

IUSG
0.5%
VEA
7.5%

Energy

IUSG
0.3%
VEA
5.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IUSG vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IUSG
IUSG Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IUSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSG Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSG Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IUSG vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IUSGVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.33

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.58

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.79

9.92

-1.12

IUSG vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IUSG Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IUSG and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IUSG vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IUSG drawdown since its inception was -63.41%, roughly equal to the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IUSG and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IUSGVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.41%

-60.68%

-2.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-11.63%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.28%

-13.45%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.21%

-29.71%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.35%

-35.73%

+3.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.37%

-1.06%

-3.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.42%

-13.28%

-8.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

3.02%

+0.14%

Volatility

IUSG vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG) is 6.20%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that IUSG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IUSGVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

6.84%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

14.38%

-1.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

16.58%

-0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.97%

16.72%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.46%

17.40%

+3.06%

IUSG vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IUSG has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IUSG vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

IUSG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IUSG
iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
0.49%0.53%0.59%1.12%1.07%0.59%0.93%1.64%1.32%1.28%1.48%1.29%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


IUSG and VEA have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to IUSG (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IUSG dropped -63.41% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 10-year performance, IUSG leads with 17.63% vs 10.72% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IUSG has been the lower-risk option at 6.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IUSG has performed better with a 17.63% return vs 10.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for IUSG.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.49% for IUSG.

IUSG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IUSG tracks S&P 900 Growth Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.04% for IUSG and 0.03% for VEA.

VEA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IUSG and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer