ITWO vs. CWB
ITWO (Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF) and CWB (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITWO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe Russell 2000 Daily Covered Call Index, while CWB is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ITWO returned 31.91% vs 21.43% for CWB. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITWO charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for CWB.
Performance
ITWO vs. CWB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITWO achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly higher than CWB's 14.96% return.
ITWO
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 11.95%
- YTD
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 31.91%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 20.57%
CWB
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -7.84%
- 6M
- 9.22%
- YTD
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 21.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.79%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- 11.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.57%
ITWO vs. CWB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 20.44% | 14.25% | 3.10% |
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 14.96% | 16.61% | 7.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITWO and CWB is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between ITWO and CWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITWO vs. CWB — Risk / Return Rank
ITWO
CWB
ITWO vs. CWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITWO | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.24 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 2.60 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.94 | 8.03 | +2.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITWO vs. CWB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITWO drawdown since its inception was -24.77%, smaller than the maximum CWB drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITWO and CWB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITWO | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.77% | -32.06% | +7.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -8.28% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -7.98% | +5.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -6.15% | +1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.67% | +0.25% |
Volatility
ITWO vs. CWB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF (ITWO) is 3.64%, while SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF (CWB) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that ITWO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITWO | CWB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 5.19% | -1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.85% | 13.31% | +0.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.88% | 16.01% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 13.33% | +7.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.33% | 14.62% | +5.71% |
ITWO vs. CWB - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITWO has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than CWB's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITWO vs. CWB - Dividend Comparison
ITWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.32%, more than CWB's 1.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CWB SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Convertible Securities ETF | 1.45% | 1.69% | 1.85% | 1.97% | 2.21% | 1.97% | 2.34% | 3.03% | 6.17% | 4.25% | 4.60% | 7.52% |
ITWO Proshares Russell 2000 High Income ETF | 7.32% | 12.12% | 4.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITWO and CWB have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CWB has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to ITWO (3.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITWO dropped -24.77% vs CWB's -32.06%.
On 1-year performance, ITWO leads with 31.91% vs 21.43% for CWB. On fees, CWB is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ITWO has been the lower-risk option at 3.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ITWO has performed better with a 31.91% return vs 21.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CWB is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ITWO.
ITWO has the higher dividend yield at 7.32%, compared with 1.45% for CWB.
ITWO is categorized as Derivative Income, while CWB is Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds. ITWO tracks Cboe Russell 2000 Daily Covered Call Index, while CWB tracks Bloomberg US Convertibles Liquid Bond. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ITWO and 0.40% for CWB.
ITWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITWO and CWB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer