ITOL vs. RODM
ITOL (Tema International Durable Quality ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ITOL is actively managed, while RODM is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITOL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.
Performance
ITOL vs. RODM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITOL achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 11.53% return.
ITOL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RODM
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 14.47%
- 1Y
- 25.55%
- 3Y*
- 20.76%
- 5Y*
- 9.68%
- 10Y*
- 8.86%
ITOL vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ITOL Tema International Durable Quality ETF | 0.58% | 3.85% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 11.53% | 4.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOL and RODM is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITOL vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank
ITOL
RODM
ITOL vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema International Durable Quality ETF (ITOL) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITOL | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.52 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
ITOL vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOL drawdown since its inception was -15.54%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOL and RODM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITOL | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.54% | -35.98% | +20.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -0.94% | -4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.60% | -6.38% | +2.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.76% | — |
Volatility
ITOL vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITOL | RODM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.06% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.86% | 10.70% | +7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 13.43% | +4.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.86% | 15.24% | +2.62% |
ITOL vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITOL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITOL vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison
ITOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than RODM's 2.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOL Tema International Durable Quality ETF | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF | 2.79% | 3.11% | 4.09% | 4.42% | 3.81% | 4.41% | 2.82% | 2.82% | 2.03% | 2.24% | 3.19% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITOL and RODM have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for ITOL.
RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.13% for ITOL.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ITOL and 0.29% for RODM.
Find the right allocation for ITOL and RODM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer