ITOL vs. HRTS
ITOL (Tema International Durable Quality ETF) and HRTS (Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITOL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Tema, while HRTS is a Health & Biotech Equities fund actively managed by Tema. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITOL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for HRTS.
Performance
ITOL vs. HRTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITOL achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than HRTS's -5.70% return.
ITOL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HRTS
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- -5.70%
- 6M
- -5.48%
- 1Y
- 20.97%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOL vs. HRTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ITOL Tema International Durable Quality ETF | 0.58% | 3.85% |
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF | -5.70% | 16.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOL and HRTS is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITOL vs. HRTS — Risk / Return Rank
ITOL
HRTS
ITOL vs. HRTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema International Durable Quality ETF (ITOL) and Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITOL | HRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.55 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
ITOL vs. HRTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOL drawdown since its inception was -15.54%, smaller than the maximum HRTS drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOL and HRTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITOL | HRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.54% | -25.81% | +10.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.01% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -9.14% | +3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.59% | -9.02% | +5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.36% | — |
Volatility
ITOL vs. HRTS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITOL | HRTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.26% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.90% | 16.03% | +1.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 19.07% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 19.07% | -1.17% |
ITOL vs. HRTS - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITOL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HRTS's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITOL vs. HRTS - Dividend Comparison
ITOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than HRTS's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
HRTS Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF | 1.42% | 1.34% | 1.63% |
ITOL Tema International Durable Quality ETF | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITOL and HRTS have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITOL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITOL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for HRTS.
HRTS has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.13% for ITOL.
ITOL is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while HRTS is Health & Biotech Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ITOL and 0.75% for HRTS.
Find the right allocation for ITOL and HRTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer