ITOL vs. UMMA
ITOL (Tema International Durable Quality ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. ITOL is actively managed, while UMMA is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITOL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.
Performance
ITOL vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITOL achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 33.52% return.
ITOL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 4.10%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UMMA
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 14.73%
- YTD
- 33.52%
- 6M
- 37.91%
- 1Y
- 54.63%
- 3Y*
- 23.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITOL vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ITOL Tema International Durable Quality ETF | 0.58% | 3.85% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 33.52% | 10.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITOL and UMMA is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2025 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITOL vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank
ITOL
UMMA
ITOL vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema International Durable Quality ETF (ITOL) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITOL | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.59 | -0.24 |
Drawdowns
ITOL vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITOL drawdown since its inception was -15.54%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITOL and UMMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITOL | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.54% | -34.17% | +18.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | 0.00% | -5.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.58% | -9.83% | +6.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.82% | — |
Volatility
ITOL vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITOL | UMMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.23% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | 20.10% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 20.56% | -2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 20.56% | -2.61% |
ITOL vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITOL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITOL vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison
ITOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than UMMA's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITOL Tema International Durable Quality ETF | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF | 0.92% | 1.02% | 0.91% | 1.09% | 1.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITOL and UMMA have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ITOL is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITOL is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for UMMA.
UMMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.13% for ITOL.
They also come from different issuers: Tema and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for ITOL and 0.65% for UMMA.
Find the right allocation for ITOL and UMMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer