PortfoliosLab logo
HRTS vs. OZEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HRTS and OZEM is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HRTS vs. OZEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

HRTS:

21.20%

OZEM:

25.76%

Max Drawdown

HRTS:

-25.81%

OZEM:

-28.65%

Current Drawdown

HRTS:

-21.54%

OZEM:

-16.39%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRTS achieves a -3.84% return, which is significantly lower than OZEM's -0.57% return.


HRTS

YTD

-3.84%

1M

0.25%

6M

-7.32%

1Y

-13.78%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

OZEM

YTD

-0.57%

1M

6.37%

6M

-1.85%

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF

HRTS vs. OZEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRTS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OZEM's 0.59% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HRTS vs. OZEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HRTS is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HRTS is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HRTS is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HRTS is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HRTS is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HRTS is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

OZEM
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HRTS vs. OZEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

HRTS vs. OZEM - Dividend Comparison

HRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, more than OZEM's 0.22% yield.


Drawdowns

HRTS vs. OZEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTS drawdown since its inception was -25.81%, smaller than the maximum OZEM drawdown of -28.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTS and OZEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HRTS vs. OZEM - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...