PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HRTS vs. OZEM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HRTS and OZEM is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.7

Performance

HRTS vs. OZEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-11.14%
-10.01%
HRTS
OZEM

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

HRTS:

19.34%

OZEM:

22.38%

Max Drawdown

HRTS:

-18.97%

OZEM:

-19.84%

Current Drawdown

HRTS:

-13.17%

OZEM:

-10.66%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HRTS having a 6.41% return and OZEM slightly lower at 6.24%.


HRTS

YTD

6.41%

1M

4.74%

6M

-11.15%

1Y

-5.23%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

OZEM

YTD

6.24%

1M

8.40%

6M

-10.01%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HRTS vs. OZEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRTS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than OZEM's 0.59% expense ratio.


HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
Expense ratio chart for HRTS: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for OZEM: current value at 0.59% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.59%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HRTS vs. OZEM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HRTS is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HRTS is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HRTS is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HRTS is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HRTS is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HRTS is 55
Martin Ratio Rank

OZEM
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HRTS vs. OZEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HRTS, currently valued at -0.23, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.23
The chart of Sortino ratio for HRTS, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-0.19
The chart of Omega ratio for HRTS, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.98
The chart of Calmar ratio for HRTS, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.24
The chart of Martin ratio for HRTS, currently valued at -0.49, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.49
HRTS
OZEM


Chart placeholderNot enough data

Dividends

HRTS vs. OZEM - Dividend Comparison

HRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than OZEM's 0.20% yield.


TTM2024
HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
1.53%1.62%
OZEM
Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF
0.20%0.22%

Drawdowns

HRTS vs. OZEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTS drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, roughly equal to the maximum OZEM drawdown of -19.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTS and OZEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-13.17%
-10.66%
HRTS
OZEM

Volatility

HRTS vs. OZEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) is 4.07%, while Roundhill Glp-1 & Weight Loss ETF (OZEM) has a volatility of 5.13%. This indicates that HRTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OZEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.07%
5.13%
HRTS
OZEM
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab