PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
HRTS vs. AIRR
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HRTS and AIRR is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

HRTS vs. AIRR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-10.22%
6.83%
HRTS
AIRR

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HRTS:

-0.27

AIRR:

1.03

Sortino Ratio

HRTS:

-0.24

AIRR:

1.55

Omega Ratio

HRTS:

0.97

AIRR:

1.19

Calmar Ratio

HRTS:

-0.28

AIRR:

2.02

Martin Ratio

HRTS:

-0.57

AIRR:

4.83

Ulcer Index

HRTS:

9.14%

AIRR:

5.13%

Daily Std Dev

HRTS:

19.34%

AIRR:

24.02%

Max Drawdown

HRTS:

-18.97%

AIRR:

-42.37%

Current Drawdown

HRTS:

-13.12%

AIRR:

-12.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRTS achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly higher than AIRR's -2.02% return.


HRTS

YTD

6.48%

1M

5.24%

6M

-10.22%

1Y

-4.12%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

AIRR

YTD

-2.02%

1M

-10.43%

6M

6.83%

1Y

27.22%

5Y*

21.22%

10Y*

15.70%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HRTS vs. AIRR - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRTS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than AIRR's 0.70% expense ratio.


HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
Expense ratio chart for HRTS: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for AIRR: current value at 0.70% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.70%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

HRTS vs. AIRR — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HRTS is 44
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HRTS is 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HRTS is 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HRTS is 44
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HRTS is 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HRTS is 44
Martin Ratio Rank

AIRR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AIRR is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AIRR is 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AIRR is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AIRR is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AIRR is 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AIRR is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HRTS vs. AIRR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HRTS, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market0.002.004.00-0.271.03
The chart of Sortino ratio for HRTS, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00-0.241.55
The chart of Omega ratio for HRTS, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.000.971.19
The chart of Calmar ratio for HRTS, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.00-0.282.02
The chart of Martin ratio for HRTS, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.574.83
HRTS
AIRR

The current HRTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is lower than the AIRR Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRTS and AIRR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00Nov 24DecemberDec 08Dec 15Dec 22Dec 29Jan 05Jan 12Jan 19Jan 26Feb 02Feb 09Feb 16
-0.27
1.03
HRTS
AIRR

Dividends

HRTS vs. AIRR - Dividend Comparison

HRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, more than AIRR's 0.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
1.53%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AIRR
First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF
0.19%0.18%0.23%0.12%0.05%0.10%0.20%0.43%0.30%0.08%0.47%0.37%

Drawdowns

HRTS vs. AIRR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTS drawdown since its inception was -18.97%, smaller than the maximum AIRR drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTS and AIRR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-13.12%
-12.26%
HRTS
AIRR

Volatility

HRTS vs. AIRR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) is 4.06%, while First Trust RBA American Industrial Renaissance ETF (AIRR) has a volatility of 6.85%. This indicates that HRTS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIRR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%9.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
4.06%
6.85%
HRTS
AIRR
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab