PortfoliosLab logo
HRTS vs. XLV
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between HRTS and XLV is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

HRTS vs. XLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

HRTS:

-0.72

XLV:

-0.40

Sortino Ratio

HRTS:

-0.85

XLV:

-0.39

Omega Ratio

HRTS:

0.89

XLV:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

HRTS:

-0.57

XLV:

-0.37

Martin Ratio

HRTS:

-1.24

XLV:

-0.84

Ulcer Index

HRTS:

11.91%

XLV:

6.46%

Daily Std Dev

HRTS:

20.73%

XLV:

14.96%

Max Drawdown

HRTS:

-25.81%

XLV:

-39.17%

Current Drawdown

HRTS:

-22.73%

XLV:

-14.59%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HRTS achieves a -5.30% return, which is significantly lower than XLV's -3.18% return.


HRTS

YTD

-5.30%

1M

-0.24%

6M

-18.77%

1Y

-14.88%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XLV

YTD

-3.18%

1M

-4.38%

6M

-10.91%

1Y

-5.92%

5Y*

7.64%

10Y*

7.93%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


HRTS vs. XLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

HRTS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

HRTS vs. XLV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HRTS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HRTS is 22
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HRTS is 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HRTS is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HRTS is 22
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HRTS is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HRTS is 33
Martin Ratio Rank

XLV
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLV is 77
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLV is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLV is 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLV is 77
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLV is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLV is 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

HRTS vs. XLV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF (HRTS) and Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current HRTS Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the XLV Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HRTS and XLV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

HRTS vs. XLV - Dividend Comparison

HRTS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than XLV's 1.76% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
HRTS
Tema Obesity & Cardiometabolic ETF
1.72%1.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLV
Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.76%1.67%1.59%1.47%1.33%1.49%2.17%1.58%1.47%1.60%1.43%1.35%

Drawdowns

HRTS vs. XLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HRTS drawdown since its inception was -25.81%, smaller than the maximum XLV drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HRTS and XLV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

HRTS vs. XLV - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...