QTUM vs. SCHD
QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QTUM returned 29.15%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for SCHD. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QTUM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
QTUM vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QTUM achieves a 53.29% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 19.01% return.
QTUM
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 23.63%
- YTD
- 53.29%
- 6M
- 50.69%
- 1Y
- 95.36%
- 3Y*
- 52.22%
- 5Y*
- 29.15%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 19.01%
- 6M
- 18.63%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.09%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 12.77%
QTUM vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 53.29% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.02% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 19.01% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -10.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between QTUM and SCHD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2018 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QTUM and SCHD has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QTUM vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QTUM
SCHD
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QTUM
SCHD
Industrials
QTUM
SCHD
Communication Services
QTUM
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
QTUM
SCHD
Healthcare
QTUM
SCHD
Basic Materials
QTUM
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
QTUM
-
SCHD
Energy
QTUM
-
SCHD
Financial Services
QTUM
-
SCHD
Real Estate
QTUM
-
SCHD
-
Utilities
QTUM
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QTUM vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
QTUM
SCHD
QTUM vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QTUM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.65 | 2.49 | +1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.26 | 3.87 | +0.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.55 | 1.45 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.28 | 5.91 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.69 | 14.53 | +9.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QTUM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65 | 2.49 | +1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.10 | 0.58 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.08 | 0.86 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
QTUM vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QTUM drawdown since its inception was -38.45%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QTUM and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QTUM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.45% | -33.37% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.26% | -4.61% | -10.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.39% | -16.13% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -16.85% | -21.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -1.40% | +0.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -3.32% | -4.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 1.88% | +2.16% |
Volatility
QTUM vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) has a higher volatility of 9.76% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 2.66%. This indicates that QTUM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QTUM | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.76% | 2.66% | +7.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.35% | 7.66% | +12.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.26% | 10.96% | +15.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.56% | 14.38% | +12.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.17% | 16.72% | +10.45% |
QTUM vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QTUM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
QTUM vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than SCHD's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.70% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.26% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QTUM and SCHD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QTUM has higher volatility (9.76%) compared to SCHD (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QTUM dropped -38.45% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 5-year performance, QTUM leads with 29.15% vs 8.36% for SCHD. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QTUM has performed better with a 29.15% return vs 8.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.
SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.70% for QTUM.
QTUM is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. QTUM tracks BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QTUM and 0.06% for SCHD.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QTUM and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer