ITM vs. IBMM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ITM (VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF) and IBMM (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds - ITM tracks the Bloomberg AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous while IBMM tracks the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. Both are passively managed. ITM charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IBMM.

Performance

ITM vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

ITM

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 0.61%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 7.29%
• 3Y*: 3.70%
• 5Y*: 0.44%
• 10Y*: 1.95%

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITM vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF	-0.47%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Return for Risk

ITM vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITM

ITM Risk / Return Rank: 67
ITM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
ITM Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
ITM Omega Ratio Rank: 87
ITM Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ITM Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITM vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF (ITM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ITM	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.58	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.74	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.13	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.84	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ITM	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	—	—

Drawdowns

ITM vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITM drawdown since its inception was -24.75%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITM and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITM	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.75%	0.00%	-24.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.43%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.75%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.33%	0.00%	-1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.98%	0.00%	-2.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ITM	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.01%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84%	0.00%	+2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.31%	0.00%	+4.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.10%	0.00%	+7.10%

ITM vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITM has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ITM vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

ITM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ITM VanEck Intermediate Muni ETF	2.93%	2.86%	2.73%	2.40%	1.92%	1.70%	2.13%	2.44%	2.33%	2.21%	2.29%	2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, ITM or IBMM?

On fees, IBMM is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITM or IBMM?

IBMM is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for ITM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITM or IBMM?

ITM has the higher dividend yield at 2.93%, compared with 0.00% for IBMM.

What is the main difference between ITM and IBMM?

ITM tracks Bloomberg AMT-Free Intermediate Continuous, while IBMM tracks S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for ITM and 0.18% for IBMM.