PortfoliosLab logo
IBMM vs. IBMN
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between IBMM and IBMN is 0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Performance

IBMM vs. IBMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Returns By Period


IBMM

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

IBMN

YTD

1.25%

1M

0.33%

6M

1.40%

1Y

3.35%

3Y*

1.89%

5Y*

0.53%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IBMM vs. IBMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IBMM and IBMN have an expense ratio of 0.18%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

IBMM vs. IBMN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IBMM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IBMM is 8282
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IBMM is 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IBMM is 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IBMM is 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IBMM is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IBMM is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

IBMN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of IBMN is 9393
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of IBMN is 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of IBMN is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of IBMN is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of IBMN is 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of IBMN is 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

IBMM vs. IBMN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

IBMM vs. IBMN - Dividend Comparison

IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBMN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018
IBMM
iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBMN
iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Muni Bond ETF
2.08%2.03%1.72%0.97%0.69%1.11%1.79%0.23%

Drawdowns

IBMM vs. IBMN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

IBMM vs. IBMN - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...