ITDH vs. SCHG
ITDH (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITDH is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by iShares, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. ITDH is actively managed, while SCHG is passively managed. Over the past year, ITDH returned 25.95% vs 17.91% for SCHG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ITDH charges 0.11%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
ITDH vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITDH achieves a 10.46% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 1.35% return.
ITDH
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- 1Y
- 25.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -3.93%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 17.91%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 18.65%
ITDH vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF | 10.46% | 21.75% | 16.71% | 12.83% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 1.35% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 12.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITDH and SCHG is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 0.85 |
The correlation between ITDH and SCHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITDH vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
ITDH
SCHG
ITDH vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITDH | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.20 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 1.10 | +1.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 3.58 | +8.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITDH vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITDH drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDH and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITDH | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.25% | -34.59% | +18.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -16.41% | +6.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -6.46% | +4.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -5.20% | +3.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 5.02% | -2.79% |
Volatility
ITDH vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) is 5.46%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that ITDH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITDH | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 5.91% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 12.52% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 16.24% | -2.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 22.38% | -7.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 21.58% | -6.88% |
ITDH vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITDH has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITDH vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ITDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITDH and SCHG have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHG has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to ITDH (5.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDH dropped -16.25% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
On 1-year performance, ITDH leads with 25.95% vs 17.91% for SCHG. On fees, SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ITDH has been the lower-risk option at 5.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ITDH has performed better with a 25.95% return vs 17.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.11% for ITDH.
ITDH has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
ITDH is categorized as Target Retirement Date, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.11% for ITDH and 0.04% for SCHG.
ITDH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITDH and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer