ITDH vs. ITDI
ITDH (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF) and ITDI (Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF) are both Target Retirement Date funds from iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, ITDH returned 25.95% vs 25.94% for ITDI. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.11% expense ratio.
Performance
ITDH vs. ITDI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ITDH having a 10.46% return and ITDI slightly lower at 10.29%.
ITDH
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 10.46%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- 1Y
- 25.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITDI
- 1D
- -1.85%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 6M
- 9.64%
- 1Y
- 25.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITDH vs. ITDI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF | 10.46% | 21.75% | 16.71% | 12.83% |
ITDI Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF | 10.29% | 21.90% | 16.73% | 12.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITDH and ITDI is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2023 | 1.00 |
The correlation between ITDH and ITDI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITDH vs. ITDI — Risk / Return Rank
ITDH
ITDI
ITDH vs. ITDI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF (ITDI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ITDH | ITDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 2.71 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.67 | 11.66 | +0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ITDH vs. ITDI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITDH drawdown since its inception was -16.25%, roughly equal to the maximum ITDI drawdown of -16.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDH and ITDI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITDH | ITDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.25% | -16.31% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.64% | -9.60% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.44% | -2.42% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -1.58% | 0.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 2.23% | 0.00% |
Volatility
ITDH vs. ITDI - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF (ITDI) have volatilities of 5.46% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITDH | ITDI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.46% | 5.35% | +0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.32% | 11.29% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.57% | 13.57% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 14.66% | +0.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.70% | 14.66% | +0.04% |
ITDH vs. ITDI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ITDH and ITDI have an expense ratio of 0.11%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ITDH vs. ITDI - Dividend Comparison
ITDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, less than ITDI's 1.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF | 1.45% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 0.84% |
ITDI Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2065 ETF | 1.48% | 1.63% | 1.68% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 1.00, ITDH and ITDI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ITDH has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to ITDI (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITDH dropped -16.25% vs ITDI's -16.31%.
On 1-year performance, ITDH leads with 25.95% vs 25.94% for ITDI. Both ETFs have the same 0.11% expense ratio. On volatility, ITDI has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ITDH has performed better with a 25.95% return vs 25.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ITDH and ITDI have the same expense ratio: 0.11% per year.
ITDI has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.45% for ITDH.
ITDH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITDH and ITDI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer