ITDH vs. AOA
Compare and contrast key facts about Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA).
ITDH and AOA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ITDH is an actively managed fund by iShares. It was launched on Oct 17, 2023. AOA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Target Risk Aggressive Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2008.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: ITDH or AOA.
Correlation
The correlation between ITDH and AOA is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
ITDH vs. AOA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
ITDH:
1.64
AOA:
1.60
ITDH:
2.22
AOA:
2.21
ITDH:
1.30
AOA:
1.29
ITDH:
2.37
AOA:
2.51
ITDH:
9.93
AOA:
9.65
ITDH:
1.96%
AOA:
1.63%
ITDH:
11.85%
AOA:
9.78%
ITDH:
-8.19%
AOA:
-28.38%
ITDH:
-3.31%
AOA:
-2.87%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITDH achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than AOA's 0.34% return.
ITDH
0.61%
-3.31%
4.71%
18.01%
N/A
N/A
AOA
0.34%
-2.87%
3.29%
14.57%
7.86%
7.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ITDH vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITDH has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than AOA's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
ITDH vs. AOA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
ITDH
AOA
ITDH vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) and iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
ITDH vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison
ITDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than AOA's 2.29% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITDH Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF | 1.65% | 1.66% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AOA iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF | 2.29% | 2.30% | 2.22% | 2.10% | 1.67% | 1.71% | 2.50% | 2.37% | 5.09% | 2.02% | 2.15% | 2.18% |
Drawdowns
ITDH vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITDH drawdown since its inception was -8.19%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITDH and AOA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
ITDH vs. AOA - Volatility Comparison
Ishares Lifepath Target Date 2060 ETF (ITDH) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to iShares Core Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA) at 3.21%. This indicates that ITDH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AOA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.