ITAN vs. MFVL

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ITAN (Sparkline Intangible Value ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

ITAN vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITAN achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's -2.40% return.

ITAN

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 11.81%
• 6M: 11.04%
• 1Y: 32.98%
• 3Y*: 21.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MFVL

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: -2.40%
• 6M: -2.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITAN vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF	11.81%	1.17%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	-2.40%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ITAN and MFVL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.77

Return for Risk

ITAN vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITAN

ITAN Risk / Return Rank: 74
ITAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ITAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
ITAN Omega Ratio Rank: 69
ITAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
ITAN Martin Ratio Rank: 77

MFVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITAN vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ITAN	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.67	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.64	—	—

Drawdowns

ITAN vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITAN drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITAN and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITAN	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.41%	-7.03%	-23.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.97%	-5.97%	+2.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.56%	-2.60%	-4.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ITAN	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.06%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.73%	12.14%	+2.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.04%	12.14%	+6.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.04%	12.14%	+6.90%

ITAN vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ITAN and MFVL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

ITAN vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

ITAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF	1.03%	0.94%	1.14%	1.01%	0.57%	0.45%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITAN and MFVL in my portfolio?

ITAN and MFVL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ITAN or MFVL?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITAN or MFVL?

ITAN and MFVL have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITAN or MFVL?

ITAN has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

What is the main difference between ITAN and MFVL?

They also come from different issuers: Sparkline Capital and Motley Fool.