ITAN vs. MFVL
ITAN (Sparkline Intangible Value ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
ITAN vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITAN achieves a 14.61% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 0.39% return.
ITAN
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- 7.43%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 6M
- 16.38%
- 1Y
- 38.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ITAN vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | 14.61% | 1.10% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITAN and MFVL is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITAN vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank
ITAN
MFVL
ITAN vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITAN | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.36 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITAN | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.31 | +0.34 |
Drawdowns
ITAN vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITAN drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITAN and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITAN | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.41% | -7.03% | -23.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -3.29% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -2.42% | -5.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | — | — |
Volatility
ITAN vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITAN | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.42% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.36% | 12.15% | +2.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 12.15% | +6.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 12.15% | +6.90% |
ITAN vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both ITAN and MFVL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
ITAN vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
ITAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | 1.00% | 0.94% | 1.14% | 1.01% | 0.57% | 0.45% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITAN and MFVL have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ITAN and MFVL have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
ITAN has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Sparkline Capital and Motley Fool.
Find the right allocation for ITAN and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer