ITAN vs. VTV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

ITAN (Sparkline Intangible Value ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. ITAN is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ITAN returned 12.16%/yr vs 12.29%/yr for VTV. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ITAN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.

Performance

ITAN vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ITAN having a 16.15% return and VTV slightly higher at 16.37%.

ITAN

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 1.85%
• 6M: 13.28%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 1Y: 36.02%
• 3Y*: 20.69%
• 5Y*: 12.16%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 12.19%

VTV

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 0.36%
• 6M: 11.27%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 1Y: 27.94%
• 3Y*: 17.12%
• 5Y*: 12.29%
• 10Y*: 12.57%
• ALL TIME*: 9.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF	$1.57M	$914.52K	$523.15K
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	$688.19M	$688.42M	$619.05M

ITAN vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF	16.15%	20.46%	17.76%	34.58%	-24.33%	6.99%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	16.37%	15.27%	15.95%	9.32%	-2.09%	8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between ITAN and VTV is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.71
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2021	0.80

The correlation between ITAN and VTV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITAN vs. VTV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ITAN	VTV
Technology	31.3%	15.3%
Healthcare	18.5%	15.2%
Communication Services	13.5%	2.9%
Consumer Cyclical	13.0%	3.9%
Industrials	12.8%	14.3%
Financial Services	4.5%	22.4%
Consumer Defensive	3.8%	8.7%
Basic Materials	1.5%	3.0%
Energy	0.7%	6.9%
Real Estate	0.4%	2.5%
Utilities	-	4.8%

Return for Risk

ITAN vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ITAN

ITAN Risk / Return Rank: 89
ITAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ITAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ITAN Omega Ratio Rank: 88
ITAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ITAN Martin Ratio Rank: 89

VTV

VTV Risk / Return Rank: 93
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 93
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ITAN vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ITAN	VTV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.30	2.62	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.12	3.74	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.47	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.74	4.24	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.81	16.42	-2.61

ITAN vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITAN and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ITAN vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITAN drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITAN and VTV.

Drawdown Indicators

	ITAN	VTV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.41%	-59.27%	+28.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.03%	-6.35%	-2.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.47%	-14.52%	-5.95%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.41%	-17.04%	-13.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.78%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.24%	-1.36%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.45%	-7.82%	+0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	1.64%	+0.80%

Volatility

ITAN vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) at 2.62%. This indicates that ITAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ITAN	VTV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.67%	2.62%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.86%	7.72%	+3.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.74%	10.36%	+4.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.02%	13.82%	+5.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.91%	16.61%	+2.30%

ITAN vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITAN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ITAN vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

ITAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than VTV's 1.86% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF	1.03%	0.94%	1.14%	1.01%	0.57%	0.45%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VTV Vanguard Value ETF	1.86%	2.05%	2.31%	2.46%	2.52%	2.15%	2.56%	2.50%	2.73%	2.29%	2.44%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ITAN and VTV in my portfolio?

ITAN and VTV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ITAN or VTV?

ITAN has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to VTV (2.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITAN dropped -30.41% vs VTV's -59.27%.

Which ETF is better, ITAN or VTV?

On 5-year performance, VTV leads with 12.29% vs 12.16% for ITAN. On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTV has been the lower-risk option at 2.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ITAN or VTV?

Over the 5-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.29% return vs 12.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ITAN or VTV?

VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ITAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ITAN or VTV?

VTV has the higher dividend yield at 1.86%, compared with 1.03% for ITAN.

What is the main difference between ITAN and VTV?

They also come from different issuers: Sparkline and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ITAN and 0.04% for VTV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.