PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ITAN vs. QVAL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ITAN vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITAN achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than QVAL's 14.95% return.


ITAN

1D
-0.42%
1M
8.25%
YTD
15.94%
6M
18.39%
1Y
40.91%
3Y*
23.85%
5Y*
10Y*

QVAL

1D
-0.05%
1M
3.06%
YTD
14.95%
6M
16.83%
1Y
31.09%
3Y*
21.75%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ITAN vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ITAN
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF
15.94%20.46%17.76%34.58%-24.33%6.97%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
14.95%10.98%12.21%28.40%-11.80%9.76%

Correlation

The correlation between ITAN and QVAL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021

0.78

The correlation between ITAN and QVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

ITAN vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ITAN
QVAL

Technology

30.5%
16.7%

Communication Services

16.4%
3.8%

Healthcare

14.8%
11.1%

Industrials

13.8%
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
32.4%

Financial Services

4.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
7.9%

Basic Materials

1.6%
7.6%

Energy

0.9%
5.5%

Real Estate

0.4%
2.0%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

ITAN
30.5%
QVAL
16.7%

Communication Services

ITAN
16.4%
QVAL
3.8%

Healthcare

ITAN
14.8%
QVAL
11.1%

Industrials

ITAN
13.8%
QVAL
15.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ITAN
13.6%
QVAL
32.4%

Financial Services

ITAN
4.6%
QVAL

-

Consumer Defensive

ITAN
3.3%
QVAL
7.9%

Basic Materials

ITAN
1.6%
QVAL
7.6%

Energy

ITAN
0.9%
QVAL
5.5%

Real Estate

ITAN
0.4%
QVAL
2.0%

Utilities

ITAN

-

QVAL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ITAN vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITAN
ITAN Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ITAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITAN Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ITAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITAN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

QVAL
QVAL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
QVAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVAL Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
QVAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVAL Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ITAN vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ITANQVALDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.87

2.16

+0.71

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.88

3.34

+0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.37

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.50

5.09

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.43

14.45

+2.98

ITAN vs. QVAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ITAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the QVAL Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITAN and QVAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ITANQVALDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.87

2.16

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.49

+0.17

Drawdowns

ITAN vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITAN drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, smaller than the maximum QVAL drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITAN and QVAL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ITANQVALDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.41%

-51.49%

+21.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-6.04%

-2.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.47%

-21.41%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.55%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-7.80%

+0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.13%

+0.20%

Volatility

ITAN vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) is 3.78%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that ITAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ITANQVALDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.47%

-0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

10.05%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.30%

14.44%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.05%

21.63%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.05%

22.79%

-3.74%

ITAN vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITAN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

ITAN vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison

ITAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than QVAL's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ITAN
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF
0.99%0.94%1.14%1.01%0.57%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QVAL
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF
1.46%1.44%1.72%1.76%2.00%1.23%1.86%1.99%1.64%1.08%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


ITAN and QVAL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QVAL has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to ITAN (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITAN dropped -30.41% vs QVAL's -51.49%.

On 3-year performance, ITAN leads with 23.85% vs 21.75% for QVAL. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, ITAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ITAN has performed better with a 23.85% return vs 21.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ITAN.

QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.99% for ITAN.

ITAN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QVAL is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sparkline Capital and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ITAN and 0.28% for QVAL.

ITAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ITAN and QVAL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer