ITAN vs. QVAL
ITAN (Sparkline Intangible Value ETF) and QVAL (Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ITAN is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Sparkline Capital, while QVAL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, ITAN returned 23.85%/yr vs 21.75%/yr for QVAL. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ITAN charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for QVAL.
Performance
ITAN vs. QVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ITAN achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than QVAL's 14.95% return.
ITAN
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 8.25%
- YTD
- 15.94%
- 6M
- 18.39%
- 1Y
- 40.91%
- 3Y*
- 23.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QVAL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 3.06%
- YTD
- 14.95%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 31.09%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
ITAN vs. QVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | 15.94% | 20.46% | 17.76% | 34.58% | -24.33% | 6.97% |
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 14.95% | 10.98% | 12.21% | 28.40% | -11.80% | 9.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ITAN and QVAL is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between ITAN and QVAL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
ITAN vs. QVAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ITAN
QVAL
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
-
-
Technology
ITAN
QVAL
Communication Services
ITAN
QVAL
Healthcare
ITAN
QVAL
Industrials
ITAN
QVAL
Consumer Cyclical
ITAN
QVAL
Financial Services
ITAN
QVAL
-
Consumer Defensive
ITAN
QVAL
Basic Materials
ITAN
QVAL
Energy
ITAN
QVAL
Real Estate
ITAN
QVAL
Utilities
ITAN
-
QVAL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ITAN vs. QVAL — Risk / Return Rank
ITAN
QVAL
ITAN vs. QVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ITAN | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.87 | 2.16 | +0.71 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.88 | 3.34 | +0.54 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.37 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.50 | 5.09 | -0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.43 | 14.45 | +2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ITAN | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.16 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.49 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
ITAN vs. QVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ITAN drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, smaller than the maximum QVAL drawdown of -51.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITAN and QVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ITAN | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.41% | -51.49% | +21.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.03% | -6.04% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.47% | -21.41% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.49% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.55% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.62% | -7.80% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.13% | +0.20% |
Volatility
ITAN vs. QVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) is 3.78%, while Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF (QVAL) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that ITAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ITAN | QVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 4.47% | -0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 10.05% | +0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.30% | 14.44% | -0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 21.63% | -2.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 22.79% | -3.74% |
ITAN vs. QVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
ITAN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QVAL's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
ITAN vs. QVAL - Dividend Comparison
ITAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than QVAL's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ITAN Sparkline Intangible Value ETF | 0.99% | 0.94% | 1.14% | 1.01% | 0.57% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QVAL Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.44% | 1.72% | 1.76% | 2.00% | 1.23% | 1.86% | 1.99% | 1.64% | 1.08% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ITAN and QVAL have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QVAL has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to ITAN (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ITAN dropped -30.41% vs QVAL's -51.49%.
On 3-year performance, ITAN leads with 23.85% vs 21.75% for QVAL. On fees, QVAL is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, ITAN has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ITAN has performed better with a 23.85% return vs 21.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QVAL is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ITAN.
QVAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.99% for ITAN.
ITAN is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while QVAL is Mid Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Sparkline Capital and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ITAN and 0.28% for QVAL.
ITAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ITAN and QVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer