PortfoliosLab logo
ITAN vs. BDGS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between ITAN and BDGS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

ITAN vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

ITAN:

0.61

BDGS:

1.49

Sortino Ratio

ITAN:

0.90

BDGS:

2.34

Omega Ratio

ITAN:

1.13

BDGS:

1.43

Calmar Ratio

ITAN:

0.54

BDGS:

1.86

Martin Ratio

ITAN:

1.95

BDGS:

8.69

Ulcer Index

ITAN:

5.63%

BDGS:

1.95%

Daily Std Dev

ITAN:

20.40%

BDGS:

11.54%

Max Drawdown

ITAN:

-30.41%

BDGS:

-9.12%

Current Drawdown

ITAN:

-6.13%

BDGS:

-0.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ITAN achieves a -0.70% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's 2.08% return.


ITAN

YTD

-0.70%

1M

5.56%

6M

-4.24%

1Y

11.41%

3Y*

12.14%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

BDGS

YTD

2.08%

1M

1.96%

6M

2.66%

1Y

16.98%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Sparkline Intangible Value ETF

Bridges Capital Tactical ETF

ITAN vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ITAN has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.


Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

ITAN vs. BDGS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ITAN
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ITAN is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ITAN is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ITAN is 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ITAN is 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ITAN is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ITAN is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

BDGS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BDGS is 9191
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BDGS is 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BDGS is 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

ITAN vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current ITAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the BDGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ITAN and BDGS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

ITAN vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison

ITAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, less than BDGS's 1.77% yield.


TTM2024202320222021
ITAN
Sparkline Intangible Value ETF
0.92%1.14%1.01%0.57%0.45%
BDGS
Bridges Capital Tactical ETF
1.77%1.81%0.84%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

ITAN vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ITAN drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ITAN and BDGS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

ITAN vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison

Sparkline Intangible Value ETF (ITAN) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 1.23%. This indicates that ITAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...