ISVBF vs. ASHR
ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) and ASHR (Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF) are both China Equities funds - ISVBF tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index while ASHR tracks the CSI 300 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISVBF returned -2.55%/yr vs -0.35%/yr for ASHR. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ISVBF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ASHR.
Performance
ISVBF vs. ASHR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISVBF achieves a -7.08% return, which is significantly lower than ASHR's 4.11% return.
ISVBF
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 8.66%
- 6M
- -11.40%
- YTD
- -7.08%
- 1Y
- 0.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.49%
- 5Y*
- -2.55%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.51%
ASHR
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -2.73%
- 6M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 4.11%
- 1Y
- 23.78%
- 3Y*
- 8.75%
- 5Y*
- -0.35%
- 10Y*
- 4.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $123.30M | $155.65M | $161.34M | |
| $155.37K | $259.62K | $313.99K |
ISVBF vs. ASHR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | -7.08% | 30.64% | 18.96% | -9.28% | -23.01% | -22.12% |
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF | 4.11% | 27.02% | 11.95% | -12.52% | -27.52% | 1.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISVBF and ASHR is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2021 | 0.26 |
Over the past year, ISVBF and ASHR have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.26, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISVBF vs. ASHR — Risk / Return Rank
ISVBF
ASHR
ISVBF vs. ASHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISVBF | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.21 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.06 | 2.38 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 6.99 | -7.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISVBF vs. ASHR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISVBF drawdown since its inception was -53.78%, roughly equal to the maximum ASHR drawdown of -51.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVBF and ASHR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISVBF | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.78% | -51.30% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.14% | -9.84% | -14.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.14% | -33.12% | +8.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.06% | -44.10% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.69% | -20.23% | -4.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.58% | -29.03% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.15% | 3.34% | +7.81% |
Volatility
ISVBF vs. ASHR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) is 6.84%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) has a volatility of 8.68%. This indicates that ISVBF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ASHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISVBF | ASHR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 8.68% | -1.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.50% | 15.50% | +11.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.73% | 19.86% | +11.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.06% | 23.98% | +6.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.07% | 24.20% | +5.87% |
ISVBF vs. ASHR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISVBF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than ASHR's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISVBF vs. ASHR - Dividend Comparison
ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASHR Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF | 2.22% | 2.31% | 1.13% | 2.48% | 1.13% | 0.88% | 0.81% | 0.98% | 1.32% | 0.84% | 0.73% | 30.13% |
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISVBF and ASHR have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ASHR has higher volatility (8.68%) compared to ISVBF (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISVBF dropped -53.78% vs ASHR's -51.30%.
On 5-year performance, ASHR leads with -0.35% vs -2.55% for ISVBF. On fees, ISVBF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, ISVBF has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ASHR has performed better with a -0.35% return vs -2.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ISVBF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ASHR.
ASHR has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for ISVBF.
ISVBF tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while ASHR tracks CSI 300 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISVBF and 0.65% for ASHR.
ASHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ISVBF and ASHR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer