ISVBF vs. CNQQ
ISVBF (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) and CNQQ (Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF) are both China Equities funds - ISVBF tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion Index while CNQQ tracks the Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech. Both are passively managed. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ISVBF charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CNQQ.
Performance
ISVBF vs. CNQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISVBF achieves a -6.75% return, which is significantly lower than CNQQ's 3.29% return.
ISVBF
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 9.06%
- 6M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 1Y
- -0.99%
- 3Y*
- 8.45%
- 5Y*
- -2.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -4.43%
CNQQ
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- -3.13%
- 6M
- 3.24%
- YTD
- 3.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $711.37K | $443.55K | $514.47K | |
| $147.49K | $255.95K | $315.23K |
ISVBF vs. CNQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | -6.75% | -5.99% |
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF | 3.29% | -5.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISVBF and CNQQ is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISVBF vs. CNQQ — Risk / Return Rank
ISVBF
CNQQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ISVBF vs. CNQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (ISVBF) and Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF (CNQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISVBF | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.09 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISVBF vs. CNQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISVBF drawdown since its inception was -53.78%, which is greater than CNQQ's maximum drawdown of -17.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVBF and CNQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISVBF | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.78% | -17.82% | -35.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.42% | -10.52% | -13.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.57% | -8.59% | -23.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.23% | — | — |
Volatility
ISVBF vs. CNQQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISVBF | CNQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.60% | 27.84% | +3.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.08% | 27.84% | +2.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.06% | 27.84% | +2.22% |
ISVBF vs. CNQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISVBF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CNQQ's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISVBF vs. CNQQ - Dividend Comparison
ISVBF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CNQQ Rayliant-ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech ETF | 0.39% | 0.09% |
ISVBF iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISVBF and CNQQ have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISVBF is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISVBF is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNQQ.
CNQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.39%, compared with 0.00% for ISVBF.
ISVBF tracks MSCI China A Inclusion Index, while CNQQ tracks Solactive ChinaAMC Transformative China Tech. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Rayliant. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISVBF and 0.75% for CNQQ.
Find the right allocation for ISVBF and CNQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer