ISUL vs. PLTM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ISUL (GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF) and PLTM (GraniteShares Platinum Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - ISUL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PLTM is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Platinum London PM Fix ($/ozt). ISUL is actively managed, while PLTM is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISUL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PLTM.

Performance

ISUL vs. PLTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF (ISUL) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISUL achieves a -52.15% return, which is significantly lower than PLTM's -9.33% return.

ISUL

• 1D: 2.45%
• 1M: -20.59%
• YTD: -52.15%
• 6M: -53.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTM

• 1D: -3.82%
• 1M: -4.28%
• YTD: -9.33%
• 6M: 11.67%
• 1Y: 71.85%
• 3Y*: 22.22%
• 5Y*: 9.22%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISUL vs. PLTM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ISUL GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF	-52.15%	56.51%
PLTM GraniteShares Platinum Trust	-9.33%	26.31%

Correlation

The correlation between ISUL and PLTM is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025	0.27

Return for Risk

ISUL vs. PLTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PLTM

PLTM Risk / Return Rank: 36
PLTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
PLTM Omega Ratio Rank: 39
PLTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PLTM Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISUL vs. PLTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF (ISUL) and GraniteShares Platinum Trust (PLTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISUL	PLTM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.54	0.24	-0.78

Drawdowns

ISUL vs. PLTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISUL drawdown since its inception was -57.20%, which is greater than PLTM's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISUL and PLTM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISUL	PLTM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.20%	-42.32%	-14.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.52%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.52%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.15%	-33.02%	-23.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.10%	-18.55%	-5.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	16.28%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ISUL	PLTM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	45.45%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.65%	51.40%	+15.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.65%	32.83%	+33.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.65%	30.98%	+35.67%

ISUL vs. PLTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISUL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTM's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISUL vs. PLTM - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISUL nor PLTM has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISUL and PLTM in my portfolio?

ISUL and PLTM have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ISUL or PLTM?

On fees, PLTM is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISUL or PLTM?

PLTM is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ISUL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISUL or PLTM?

ISUL and PLTM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ISUL and PLTM?

ISUL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PLTM is Precious Metals. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ISUL and 0.50% for PLTM.