ISUL vs. ARMG
ISUL (GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF) and ARMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.22 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. ISUL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ARMG.
Performance
ISUL vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISUL achieves a -62.09% return, which is significantly lower than ARMG's 188.60% return.
ISUL
- 1D
- 12.37%
- 1M
- -26.48%
- 6M
- -50.07%
- YTD
- -62.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
ARMG
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -46.52%
- 6M
- 209.21%
- YTD
- 188.60%
- 1Y
- 58.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.97%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.41M | $19.14M | $65.85M | |
| $1.41M | $2.11M | $1.38M |
ISUL vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ISUL GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF | -62.09% | 55.46% |
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 188.60% | -54.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISUL and ARMG is 0.22, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISUL vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank
ISUL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ARMG
ISUL vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF (ISUL) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISUL | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.20 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISUL vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISUL drawdown since its inception was -72.19%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISUL and ARMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISUL | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.19% | -80.28% | +8.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -76.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -65.26% | -73.68% | +8.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.12% | -52.19% | +21.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 41.34% | — |
Volatility
ISUL vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISUL | ARMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 49.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 128.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.23% | 147.13% | -70.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.23% | 145.23% | -69.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 76.23% | 145.23% | -69.00% |
ISUL vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISUL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISUL vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison
ISUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMG Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF | 1.69% | 4.86% |
ISUL GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISUL and ARMG have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ISUL.
ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.00% for ISUL.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ISUL and 0.75% for ARMG.
Find the right allocation for ISUL and ARMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer