ISUL vs. XDSQ
ISUL (GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF) and XDSQ (Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISUL charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for XDSQ.
Performance
ISUL vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISUL achieves a -53.17% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's 4.31% return.
ISUL
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -3.31%
- 6M
- -56.15%
- YTD
- -53.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDSQ
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 9.64%
- 10Y*
- —
ISUL vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ISUL GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF | -53.17% | 55.46% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 4.31% | 3.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISUL and XDSQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISUL vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
ISUL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XDSQ
ISUL vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF (ISUL) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISUL | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.29 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.54 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISUL vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISUL drawdown since its inception was -58.68%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISUL and XDSQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISUL | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.68% | -26.06% | -32.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.15% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.08% | 0.00% | -57.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.11% | -4.87% | -23.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.01% | — |
Volatility
ISUL vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISUL | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.32% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.89% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.06% | 10.53% | +55.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.06% | 15.27% | +50.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.06% | 14.96% | +51.10% |
ISUL vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISUL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISUL vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISUL nor XDSQ has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISUL and XDSQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDSQ is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDSQ is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ISUL.
ISUL and XDSQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ISUL and 0.79% for XDSQ.
Find the right allocation for ISUL and XDSQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer