PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISUL vs. FBL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISUL vs. FBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF (ISUL) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISUL achieves a -52.15% return, which is significantly lower than FBL's -19.72% return.


ISUL

1D
2.45%
1M
-20.59%
YTD
-52.15%
6M
-53.16%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBL

1D
8.48%
1M
2.55%
YTD
-19.72%
6M
-15.34%
1Y
-29.78%
3Y*
33.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISUL vs. FBL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ISUL
GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF
-52.15%56.51%
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
-19.72%-18.71%

Correlation

The correlation between ISUL and FBL is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISUL vs. FBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISUL

FBL
FBL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISUL vs. FBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF (ISUL) and GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ISUL vs. FBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISULFBLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.54

1.12

-1.66

Drawdowns

ISUL vs. FBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISUL drawdown since its inception was -57.20%, smaller than the maximum FBL drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISUL and FBL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISULFBLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.20%

-61.15%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-56.15%

-47.97%

-8.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.10%

-16.41%

-7.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

32.76%

Volatility

ISUL vs. FBL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISULFBLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

53.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.65%

70.42%

-3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.65%

71.06%

-4.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.65%

71.06%

-4.41%

ISUL vs. FBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISUL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FBL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISUL vs. FBL - Dividend Comparison

ISUL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%.


PositionTTM202520242023
FBL
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF
2.58%2.07%0.00%51.58%
ISUL
GraniteShares 2X Long ISRG Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISUL and FBL have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FBL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FBL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for ISUL.

FBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.00% for ISUL.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for ISUL and 1.15% for FBL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISUL and FBL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer